• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

PCG News on gov contracts - Will the government ever **** off and leave me alone?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Because they hired you as a member of a team, a temporary employee to fill a gap.
    Bursting my bubble again aren't you lol and I always thought of myself as a billable asset
    In Scooter we trust

    Comment


      #32
      The best things would be to drop all tax and just have a land value tax. Oooh yeah, the dream.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by speling bee View Post
        So a management consultant is an employee of the client?
        They're already employed by the consultancy.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          They're already employed by the consultancy.
          And I'm employed by my consultancy. I am also a Director and Shareholder, as are some management consultants. But you are suggesting that I am a disguised employee of the client, but the management consultant is not. Or are you saying something else?
          The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

          George Frederic Watts

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

          Comment


            #35
            If you really can't see a difference between a company hiring multiple people on a proper salary and charging them out to turn a profit, and one person charging themself out as a company and taking all the money as dividends, there's probably no way we can debate this.
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
            Originally posted by vetran
            Urine is quite nourishing

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              If you really can't see a difference between a company hiring multiple people on a proper salary and charging them out to turn a profit, and one person charging themself out as a company and taking all the money as dividends, there's probably no way we can debate this.
              How disappointing. Hopefully I can find someone more clever than you to debate with.
              The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

              George Frederic Watts

              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

              Comment


                #37
                I wish you luck finding someone clever enough to figure out how to explain it to you.
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                  I wish you luck finding someone clever enough to figure out how to explain it to you.
                  I forgive you.
                  The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                  George Frederic Watts

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                  Comment


                    #39
                    I look forward to the PCG putting celebrities & politicians through the example tests.

                    The <insert footballer's image rights name here> fails the IR35 test.

                    The <Comedian> fails the test.

                    The <Politicians personal appearance company> fails the test, lets see the gurning idiot pass.

                    a few of those will derail these.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                      If you really can't see a difference between a company hiring multiple people on a proper salary and charging them out to turn a profit, and one person charging themself out as a company and taking all the money as dividends, there's probably no way we can debate this.
                      the difference is that instead of the person who did the work getting to keep all the money, it gets shared amongst the government a bit more via PAYE/NI and then the rest goes to investors / pension schemes via their divvy... which dont get the tax credit anymore, so the gov get a bit more there too.

                      I never worked out how comanies are willing to pay £1000/day for someone just coz they are thru a big consultancy, yet they can get the same person half price or less going direct. The company as far as I can tell, add no value other than acting as a magnet for people who want a career rather than some work.

                      ?
                      Signed sealed and delivered.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X