Originally posted by sasguru
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Maybe we should take Eugenics more seriously?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Hindsight is a wonderful thingOriginally posted by sasguru View PostWe should have supported indigenous manufacturing, yes.*
We should have tried harder to not throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Everyone else does it, not least that bastion of free enterprise, the US.
*Even the Tories are making noises about this now.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
It's not though is it, the market spectaculary failed and the Taxpayer had to underwrite that failure otherwise the whole system would have imploded. If something isn't done it WILL happen again. What was allowed to happen was madness.Originally posted by Robinho View PostEssentially it is all self-regulating in the end though. What we have just got is a huge learning lesson in the age of financial deregulation. Does that mean we should slap all the regulations back on? No, we should just think more carefully about getting that crazy mortgage on a pauper's wage. In addition the government shouldn't deficit spend during the boom years.Comment
-
State control under fascism is substantially overstated because it is viewed within the context of the war-time economy. And in any case you are, I think, confusing capitalism with free market capitalism. Capitalism dies not require free markets. It requires the ability to deploy capital for profit and the less restrained that deploymentl, the better.Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo this is exactly what Anarcho-Capitalism or Libertarianism does. Fascism control large parts of the economy - this is not capitalistic. Punishment of the working class is not a capitalistic concept. Collective bargaining is capitalistic - capitalism is about negotiating for the sale of goods and services. What is not capitalistic is giving trade unions unnatural rights.
But we may have to agree to disagree.Comment
-
It happened to Iceland and they're doing alright now.Originally posted by ZARDOZ View PostIt's not though is it, the market spectaculary failed and the Taxpayer had to underwrite that failure otherwise the whole system would have imploded. If something isn't done it WILL happen again. What was allowed to happen was madness.Comment
-
QFTOriginally posted by sasguru View PostIf the liberalisation of markets had not been allowed, perhaps we wouldn't have had the illusion of wealth that the City and Wall Street seemed to create over the last 25 years.Comment
-
and this too, too true!Originally posted by BrilloPad View Postits been downhill since we went off the gold standard.Comment
-
Thats scary to me.. very scary.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe key to a good economy is to minimise government intervention. There is basically no need for it at all.
Do you truely believe that without regulation and intervention from governments , business will behave?
The only mandate is to maximise profits.
Holy hell, this statement really does scare me.Comment
-
I will agree that you are fundamentally wrong.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostState control under fascism is substantially overstated because it is viewed within the context of the war-time economy. And in any case you are, I think, confusing capitalism with free market capitalism. Capitalism dies not require free markets. It requires the ability to deploy capital for profit and the less restrained that deploymentl, the better.
But we may have to agree to disagree.Comment
-
And how do you maximise profits? By agreeing to mutually beneficial transactions with consumers.Originally posted by Scoobos View PostThats scary to me.. very scary.
Do you truely believe that without regulation and intervention from governments , business will behave?
The only mandate is to maximise profits.
Holy hell, this statement really does scare me.
The government must protect property rights and contract laws and that is more or less it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Yesterday 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment