Originally posted by Old Hack
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Should I get a Porche Boxster?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Why should anyone give a toss what other people think of their car?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Because they look like they're inviting anal rampage in a Boxster, makes you look fagnosticOriginally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWhy should anyone give a toss what other people think of their car?Comment
-
Funny you say that and don't realise that you come across here as a right cock-knobber whose wife is having an affair.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostBecause they look like they're inviting anal rampage in a Boxster, makes you look fagnostic
For someone whose own self-assessment is that he is too bright for the bobs, you don't come across as having a lot of self-knowledge.


Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Maybe they just like the car?Originally posted by Old Hack View PostBecause they look like they're inviting anal rampage in a Boxster, makes you look fagnostic
I can understand that. I think it looks quite good and I don't want a car that's really 'sporty' because I don't see myself as a gifted driver, unlike the immeasurably gifted people who drive Audis on the motorway (there really is no beginning to their talents); I just want a decent looking (to me) car that can be a bit of fun but also comfortable and reliable. OK, the porsche isn't my taste, but I can understand why people would enjoy it without necessarily being old and homosexual. It's a nice car, simples. Not everyone wants an out and out race car; happily we don't all have the illusion that we can control out and out high performance cars.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
What you don't understand is old Cock-Knobber gets into his 10 year-old Focus every day, bored out of his skull from the dreary, ill-paid work that even the Bobs won't do.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostMaybe they just like the car?
I can understand that. I think it looks quite good and I don't want a car that's really 'sporty' because I don't see myself as a gifted driver, unlike the immeasurably gifted people who drive Audis on the motorway (there really is no beginning to their talents); I just want a decent looking (to me) car that can be a bit of fun but also comfortable and reliable. OK, the porsche isn't my taste, but I can understand why people would enjoy it without necessarily being old and homosexual. It's a nice car, simples. Not everyone wants an out and out race car; happily we don't all have the illusion that we can control out and out high performance cars.
So of course he;'s got be a blow-hard on here.


Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Ah, so we've tried the buttering me up, which didn't work, so now back to the abusive approach - way to go ass.Originally posted by sasguru View PostFunny you say that and don't realise that you come across here as a right cock-knobber whose wife is having an affair.
For someone whose own self-assessment is that he is too bright for the bobs, you don't come across as having a lot of self-knowledge.



I have never said I am too bright for the bobs, that's the limitation in your understanding and knowledge of the English language coming out again, I merely pointed out I have lodged myself in an area immune from their advances. How you've deduced I am cuckold is amusing, very amusing. Kind of reverting to your inner child on the playground.
The cockknobber comment, for me, is a badge of honour coming from someone so universally ridiculed as being a bit of a Billy Liar, Walter Mitty and
of such high distinction, utterly from the top drawer.
Thanks for that.Comment
-
Hahahahahaha,Originally posted by sasguru View PostWhat you don't understand is old Cock-Knobber gets into his 10 year-old Focus every day, bored out of his skull from the dreary, ill-paid work that even the Bobs won't do.
So of course he;'s got be a blow-hard on here.



Oh, I'll give you a mark for trying.
Keep going ass, too funy for words, coming from you.
Thought you were out in the garden enjoying a beer and completing your thesis
Comment
-
Well that is a nice piece of trolling there.Originally posted by Old Hack View PostI'd never buy a Boxster for the following
a) I am not gay
b) I am not over 50 & a
c) If I am looking for a drivers car, I would buy one whose structural integrity hasn't been compromised by having no roof.
d) I am not a hairdresser or aspire to be one
e) I would look like I couldn't afford a real one (Porsche).
f) They start at 38k for a car with less power then a Vauxhall Astra.
g) It shouts I have no imagination.
h) It would shout I have attempted to be a winner in life, but ironically, buying this proves I have lost.
It screams as our French cousins would say of Quebecois:, ce n'est pas la chose reelle
Alas, for the benefit of the OP, on the structural integrity thing.
The Boxster was designed from a clean sheet of paper for the chassis to work well without a roof, this is why the track times between the Cayman and Boxster are so close. The hardtop does little.
There is little scuttle, no body roll (a 997 911 cab does this, they fixed it with the 991S with PDDC) and the chassis does not flex, it is perfectly balanced due to its mid engined, rear wheel drive design. When you corner, you smile.
The car is lower on power than some hot hatches but this does not matter, the tyres on the back are almost a foot wide and the car corners like a go kart, this gives you confidence to use all the power available more of the time, even in the wet, she was not built for drag racing but for generating smiles-per-mile.
It's not a car defined by numbers or cliches from the Clarkson handbook.Comment
-
Depends how you get your smiles I guess.Originally posted by Bluenose View Postshe was not built for drag racing but for generating smiles-per-mile.
I loathe it, it's a shining beacon of tulipe, in my opinion, not Clarksons. I have driven it, and the chassis isn't rigid; a friends R26R would murder it on a track and I have had much more fun driving an old Alfa Spider. I firmly believe it is not very good, considering the alternatives. The new one is better, but also far more expensive, for a properly specc'd one, and you could afford far more car than what the Boxster offers.
Jaysus, a 5 year old 911 Cabriolet you can buy for half the price, own it for a year and lose nothing. The only thing guaranteed about the boxster, from new, is that you will lose money.Comment
-
Best car to drive I ever had was (got it 2003) a 1988 Alfa 75 Twin Spark, it was brilliant, unstickable, cornered on rails (lived in darkest Dumfries and Galloway at the time, cracking roads), wasn't that fast but felt reckless but straight, women refused to drive it - too fast. When it wasn't really....
Loved it, had the 3.0 manual too at the same time, that was a pig, nose heavy despite the V6 not being that much heavier....
Front engine, rear clutch and gearbox, inboard rear discs, mental in a production car....
It's not just about bhp.......Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Today 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10

Comment