Here's a useful explanation of the sentence by a lawyer: The sentencing of Mick Philpott | Jack of Kent
TLDR:
TLDR:
"A straight thirty year sentence for Philpott would have sounded harsher; but he would only have to serve half before release.
"A life sentence with a minimum of fifteen years instead means only the possibility of parole after fifteen years. It is a paradox but life with a minimum of fifteen years is harsher than a straight sentence of thirty years."
"A life sentence with a minimum of fifteen years instead means only the possibility of parole after fifteen years. It is a paradox but life with a minimum of fifteen years is harsher than a straight sentence of thirty years."
Comment