Watching it on Sky HD recorded, after old firm, watched F1 years ago when it was Hill etc. It's great to see it's just as exciting now, watching them standing about as it pisses down.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Grand Prix
Collapse
X
-
-
-
What team orders, I didn't hear that on BBC.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostYou'll be disappointed. Team orders ruined the 'race'.
What do people think of the BBC highlights packages? I'm pleasantly surprised... they basically show the whole race and all of Q3, and when the race stops for nearly an hour they cut it out.
I'm more upset by the new commentator than the change in format. He talks too much... how come he's taking the lead as the new boy, rather than Cooltard?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
5 laps to go, Perez in the Sauber-Ferrari is a second a lap quicker than Alonso in the Ferrari, and right up his arse preparing to overtake on DRS.Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhat team orders, I didn't hear that on BBC.
At that point he was told on the radio "Don't take a risk, we need second place" (there wasn't a risk). So a few seconds later he ran wide at a corner to lose a couple of seconds, then held station to the end.
P1ssed me off.
It's only a coincidence that Perez's team are getting their engines from Ferrari.Last edited by Doggy Styles; 26 March 2012, 09:40.Comment
-
Nobody would go off like that on purpose (if they want to finish in 2nd), it's far more risky. He wouldn't need to manufacture it either, he could just tailgate Alonso and claim he couldn't find a safe overtake - which they are allowed to tell him to do.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
No, he was very careful and simply drove off the track where there was a good run-off area. It looked manufactured to me.Originally posted by d000hg View PostNobody would go off like that on purpose (if they want to finish in 2nd), it's far more risky. He wouldn't need to manufacture it either, he could just tailgate Alonso and claim he couldn't find a safe overtake - which they are allowed to tell him to do.
I'm not sure if having the same engine supplier allows you to use team orders but, even if allowed, people don't like it. There is also a lot of talk about Perez replacing Massa at Ferrari, so he may as well get used to not being allowed to overtake Alonso.+50 Xeno Geek Points
Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux.Pogle
As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF
Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005
CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012
Comment
-
A lot of cars got caught out there, very easy to lose front end grip and wash wide at that corner when following a car so closely. Whilst it looked odd, and a bit iffy, I think it wasn't planned. However, having said that, it would be a believeable area to go wide, and a safe one too...Originally posted by Zippy View PostNo, he was very careful and simply drove off the track where there was a good run-off area. It looked manufactured to me.
I'm not sure if having the same engine supplier allows you to use team orders but, even if allowed, people don't like it. There is also a lot of talk about Perez replacing Massa at Ferrari, so he may as well get used to not being allowed to overtake Alonso.
Who knows, very odd given just how much faster he was, and how short of money and sponsors Sauber are right now...Comment
-
WZMS, especially coming 30 seconds after he was told to back off. In the position he was in before he went wide he couldn't help but overtake Alonso, and to not do so would have looked strange.Originally posted by Zoiderman View Post...However, having said that, it would be a believeable area to go wide, and a safe one too...
Who knows, very odd given just how much faster he was, and how short of money and sponsors Sauber are right now...Comment
-
WZSOriginally posted by Zippy View PostNo, he was very careful and simply drove off the track where there was a good run-off area. It looked manufactured to me.
I'm not sure if having the same engine supplier allows you to use team orders but, even if allowed, people don't like it. There is also a lot of talk about Perez replacing Massa at Ferrari, so he may as well get used to not being allowed to overtake Alonso.I didn't say it was your ******* fault, I said I was blaming you!Comment
-
He wasn't told to back off, and his off wasn't 30 seconds after he was told to "be careful". Second place means an awful lot to a team like Sauber, and especially with their struggles with sponsorship. That could be millions of pounds at the end of the year, so some calming words to an excited young driver would be pretty sensible. I've always thought of myself as kind of cynical, but the fact that lots of people seem to be able to look at that race result and see team orders makes me realise I'm in fact quite balanced and well-adjusted.Originally posted by Doggy Styles View PostWZMS, especially coming 30 seconds after he was told to back off. In the position he was in before he went wide he couldn't help but overtake Alonso, and to not do so would have looked strange.
Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Today 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55

Comment