Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
He did a pretty decent job to be honest I can't see why they want to replace him
Experience.
As rugby union now seems to revolve entirely around world cups, and the next one is the target for whoever they employ, there's a school of thought that its better to have someone who has had the unique experience of at least one world cup before, and done reasonably well. Lancaster hasn't even been as a player, let alone a head coach.
It's a fair point. Not saying I necessarily agree with it mind, just saying.
I can see what you're saying, but basically it's still down to how the team performs and even some of the team will not have had world cup experience but that doesn't necessarily stop them being picked for it when it comes around.
Understand both sides of the argument. Read this morning, both men are to be interviewed towards the end of the week so on the surface, it's an equal contest...
IMHO, to get a new team to jell so quickly at international level is quite an achievement and should be given the nod.
Comment