Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Personally I'd love to watch Lancaster carry on. Despite only being a caretaker he's had a long-term plan from the start and the players have all bought into it.
And after what Lancaster has done so far, anyone else who gets it will have a big job winning over the players, the public, and several in the RFU.
I just hope there isn't some fudge whereby they both get a job, with the words 'mentor' or 'director of rugby' mentioned. Whoever they pick must be totally in charge.
I think it's time to take a risk and keep him they finished runners up in the 6 Nations and destroyed the Irish Scrum on the weekend a massive improvement from their World Cup campaign I'd say.
Understand both sides of the argument. Read this morning, both men are to be interviewed towards the end of the week so on the surface, it's an equal contest...
IMHO, to get a new team to jell so quickly at international level is quite an achievement and should be given the nod.
I can see what you're saying, but basically it's still down to how the team performs and even some of the team will not have had world cup experience but that doesn't necessarily stop them being picked for it when it comes around.
He did a pretty decent job to be honest I can't see why they want to replace him
Experience.
As rugby union now seems to revolve entirely around world cups, and the next one is the target for whoever they employ, there's a school of thought that its better to have someone who has had the unique experience of at least one world cup before, and done reasonably well. Lancaster hasn't even been as a player, let alone a head coach.
It's a fair point. Not saying I necessarily agree with it mind, just saying.
Leave a comment: