Ahem.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Congrats Pondlife
Collapse
X
-
-
Flashing you bits ought to be kept for beads not for repOriginally posted by k2p2 View PostAhem.
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Pondlife again.
shall I spread it around by giving k2p2 someComment
-
Nah you need to include NLUK as well. Its only fair (and would defeat the whole purpose).Originally posted by FiveTimes View PostYou must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Pondlife again.
shall I spread it around by giving k2p2 somemerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I think you know who deserves itOriginally posted by FiveTimes View PostYou must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Pondlife again.
shall I spread it around by giving k2p2 someCoffee's for closersComment
-
That is the purpose. Everyone deserves rep.Originally posted by eek View PostNah you need to include NLUK as well. Its only fair (and would defeat the whole purpose).
Getting twitchy yet MF?Comment
-
DoneOriginally posted by eek View PostNah you need to include NLUK as well. Its only fair (and would defeat the whole purpose).
Comment
-
I think the fact all the Mod's love the rep reset idea is probably making him more twitchy.Originally posted by k2p2 View PostThat is the purpose. Everyone deserves rep.
Getting twitchy yet MF?

I'm also impressed in how evil that scheme would be.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
That would help me alot as effectively I started from zero in October.Originally posted by eek View PostI think the fact all the Mod's love the rep reset idea is probably making him more twitchy.

I'm also impressed in how evil that scheme would be.
But interesting that rep has taken over from post count recently - I wonder what the next important thing on cuk will be?Comment
-
BanningsOriginally posted by BrilloPad View PostThat would help me alot as effectively I started from zero in October.
But interesting that rep has taken over from post count recently - I wonder what the next important thing on cuk will be?
I think it would be difficult for MF to be banned for a week and still not be number 1 on rep points. He had in excess of 10K when he was bannedCoffee's for closersComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment