Irans Big Nuclear News

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

You'd build up your military arsenal to if you were surrounded by hostile nations that are laying claim to the land your people live on, even after Israel made concessions and gave them the gaza strip they still weren't happy

Wow aren't Israel generous, how about I come and rob your 5 bedroom house and give you a corner of the shed to live in with your whole extended family? If your not happy with that then you should go and live in somebody else's shed...

[saptastic]

Regardless of your views on Iran (which incidentally are always made out to be crazy villains in the western media) they are in a tough situation. Either they try to deter the aggressive Israelis with a Nuke or they stand by and risk themselves being the victims of Nukes from a future nut case Israeli leader - actually I take that back, they only have one choice - get the Nuke for self defence purposes given all the above facts...

Tough situation?? Or the third choice is not worry about Nukes and get on with building an economy - stop sponsoring terrorism across the globe & stop publicly stating that your neigbours should be completely wiped off the planet.[/QUOTE]

[/QUOTE]Sorry are you talking about Iran, Israel, USA or somebody else there? It's alright for Saudi to openly sponsor terrorism all over the world and for UK to be best buddies with them? USA sponsored terrorism in NI, Jordan sponsors terrorism in Iraq. Interesting to see how the media spin has made you believe everything you hear....

So Israel is slowly wiping Palestine off both the map and the planet. It wouldn't mind doing that to Lebanon too, but hey that's ok cos Israel is "friends" with us. Israel is also spending huge amounts on military and are having economic problems. They already have the nuclear arsenal but I guess that is ok too.... Very funny how that statement could be applied perfectly to Israel....[/QUOTE]


So you are saying because they see sponsored terrorism going on elsewhere they should join in the fun?
Also no other country states another country should be wiped off the map. I am not spun by the western media in anyway, but I dont agree that Iran have to nuke up to defend themselves.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

So you are saying because they see sponsored terrorism going on elsewhere they should join in the fun?
Also no other country states another country should be wiped off the map. I am not spun by the western media in anyway, but I dont agree that Iran have to nuke up to defend themselves.

Nothing justifies terrorism, it's just about time some of you hypocrites opened up your eyes to the double standards going on here. I disagree with having a Nuke on principle but that's not my point - which everybody keeps trying to avoid. If you are singled out in the whole of the world wouldn't you start to feel a bit vulnerable and in the need of a deterrent? It's very simple straight forward logic here, nothing that is difficult to comprehend.

[The Spartan]

Seeing as you don't justify terrorism how about:

The PLO
Hamas
Hezbollah

obviously these were just freedom fighters then

There are plenty of arab nations that surround Israel so why not take on those that are so hard done by the Israeli's

[KimberleyChris]

The cowboy is optional.

The B52 isn't.

Well, you can mount at least five warheads to just one Trident missile, so you could probably drop one warhead from a Sopwith Camel if you wanted to. But a Jericho missile is better :-)

[DodgyAgent]

No less rational than the nut cases in Washington and Israel.... and if they are it's because they are being forced into irrational thinking....

The difference is that the Nutcases in Washington and Israel can be voted out of power those in Iran cannot be.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Seeing as you don't justify terrorism how about:

The PLO
Hamas
Hezbollah

obviously these were just freedom fighters then

There are plenty of arab nations that surround Israel so why not take on those that are so hard done by the Israeli's

Right you have a point there.... except Israel is the most powerful military force in the region, Israel already has nukes, Israel always kills 100 for every 1 of it that is killed (disproportionate force), Israel has an excellent track record towards civilians (killing them that is), Israel was founded on terrorism. You can not define terrorism just when it suits you. Israel is not in danger - it has the US and the whole of the west behind it! So who exactly is it scared of? Saudi, Jordan, Egypt, Kuwait, UAE (and every other puppet government in the region)? Syria is weak militarily and would be destroyed by Israel in hours, same goes for Iran. So who should fear who here?

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

The difference is that the Nutcases in Washington and Israel can be voted out of power those in Iran cannot be.

Oh Really? Democracy in US and Israel is that good is it....

[Churchill]

Right you have a point there.... except Israel is the most powerful military force in the region, Israel already has nukes, Israel always kills 100 for every 1 of it that is killed (disproportionate force), Israel has an excellent rack record towards civilians (killing them that is), Israel was founded on terrorism. You can not define terrorism just when it suits you. Israel is not in danger - it has the US and the whole of the west behind it! So who exactly is it scared of? Saudi, Jordan, Egypt, Kuwait, UAE (and every other puppet government in the region)? Syria is weak militarily and would be destroyed by Israel in hours, same goes for Iran. So who should fear who hear?

Syria could wipe the floor with Israel.

Hth.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Syria could wipe the floor with Israel.

Hth.

Your sarcasm makes my point all the stronger.....