Originally posted by Churchill
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The word Bob
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
I said...Originally posted by TiroFijo View PostLikewise.
Sorry mate, you're still showing a 1 on the scale of 1 to 100 on the giveaf*ckometer. Try a bit louder!Last edited by administrator; 18 October 2011, 10:33. Reason: Too big. Open plan office. Jumpers for goal posts.Comment
-
The word "Bob" is used on here in a semi-racist fashion. I don't suppose Bob gives a crap if you underestimate him though, eventually there'll be enough good Bobs to put you all out of a job.
HTHHard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Bob a job?Originally posted by sasguru View PostThe word "Bob" is used on here in a semi-racist fashion. I don't suppose Bob gives a crap if you underestimate him though, eventually there'll be enough good Bobs to put you all out of a job.
HTH
IGMCScience isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
You're such a child.Originally posted by Churchill View PostI said...
Sorry mate, you're still showing a 1 on the scale of 1 to 100 on the giveaf*ckometer. Try a bit louder!Comment
-
Comment
-
It seems to normally imply a mixture of affection, frustration and insult, all wrapped up in a racial stereotype. I'm sure we'll be banned from saying it one day.Originally posted by sasguru View PostThe word "Bob" is used on here in a semi-racist fashion.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Well, one of "us" and by "us" I mean "TiroFijo" is already heading that way. He'll be needing this -->Originally posted by d000hg View PostIt seems to normally imply a mixture of affection, frustration and insult, all wrapped up in a racial stereotype. I'm sure we'll be banned from saying it one day.
Comment
-
The whole Bob thing started with our esteemed member, offering much quickness with plenty cheapness, Bob Showaddywaddy. When referring to an Indian working in IT for one of the off (or on) shore companies, I think it's ok.Originally posted by Arturo Bassick View Post...Do I now have to change my understanding to accept that the term "Bob" is a reference to an Indian chap who works in IT and offers much quickness plenty cheap...
When it's used to generally portray Indian nationals in a negative way, I don't think it is acceptable. It wasn't TiroFijo's use of "Bob" that triggered the deletion - and infraction - it was the way he used it, which I considered crossed the line. Similarly, but not quite so far across the line, was Freamon's post. Also deleted, but without infraction - which had nothing to do with any brown envelopes, honest, guv.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
We're still allow to racially abuse the Scottish members of the board though? Right? Just want to make sure that English - Scottish racism is acceptable.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostThe whole Bob thing started with our esteemed member, offering much quickness with plenty cheapness, Bob Showaddywaddy. When referring to an Indian working in IT for one of the off (or on) shore companies, I think it's ok.
When it's used to generally portray Indian nationals in a negative way, I don't think it is acceptable. It wasn't TiroFijo's use of "Bob" that triggered the deletion - it was the way he used it, which I considered crossed the line. Similarly, but not quite so far across the line, was Freamon's post. Also deleted.
What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Yesterday 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment