Originally posted by NotAllThere
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
My Favourite CUK posters
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Its the mildest insult imaginable so given the rules of this place if pillock was an infraction offence we would all be immediately and permanently excluded.Originally posted by wim121 View PostIsnt that technically, an infraction for insulting other members?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Thankfully it is not. So put that in your pipe and smoke it wim................you pillock!!Originally posted by eek View PostIts the mildest insult imaginable so given the rules of this place if pillock was an infraction offence we would all be immediately and permanently excluded.
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
No. First, it could easily be read as suggesting a hypothetical example. Second, insulting other members isn't in and of itself an infractable offense, you overblown tart. It's got a lot to do with context, frequency and the time of the month.Originally posted by wim121 View PostIsnt that technically, an infraction for insulting other members?
This is one reason why we don't have a definitive and prescriptive list of rules. If we have a list of rules, you'll always find some overblown tart and/or pillock who'll try to work within the letter of the rules.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Another one from the Board's Uriah Heap.Originally posted by eek View PostIts the mildest insult imaginable so given the rules of this place if pillock was an infraction offence we would all be immediately and permanently excluded.Comment
-
Stand down there soldier. That's not how I taught you to moderate a forum.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNo. First, it could easily be read as suggesting a hypothetical example. Second, insulting other members isn't in and of itself an infractable offense, you overblown tart. It's got a lot to do with context, frequency and the time of the month.
This is one reason why we don't have a definitive and prescriptive list of rules. If we have a list of rules, you'll always find some overblown tart and/or pillock who'll try to work within the letter of the rules.
I may have to come out of retirement and start to clean this mess up. Sigh.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
"Second, insulting other members isn't in and of itself an infractable offense, you overblown tart. It's got a lot to do with context, frequency and the time of the month".
You missed one out, i.e. there are different 'rules' depending on how long they have been posting here.Comment
-
No there are not. The rules are the same. They're just more harshly applied to humourless little tits.Originally posted by Craic View PostYou missed one out, i.e. there are different 'rules' depending on how long they have been posting here.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
I think that an analysis of the bannings would show that the rules are not the same. I would invite you to go and look at bannings over a period of time to see whether they are more harshly applied to newcomers or veterans.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNo there are not. The rules are the same. They're just more harshly applied to humourless little tits.Comment
-
Get over yourself, if you don't like it here might I suggest you leave.Originally posted by Craic View PostI think that an analysis of the bannings would show that the rules are not the same. I would invite you to go and look at bannings over a period of time to see whether they are more harshly applied to newcomers or veterans.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11

Comment