- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Billions needed for Wind farm back up
Collapse
X
-
-
Incredible isn't it? I knew this all along, why didn't the politicians who run the country realise this? I am amazed it has taken so long to work out that when all the present base load coal fired and nuclear plant is closed, then the lights will go out unless we have just the right kind of wind.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k. -
And I thought one of the driving forces for new engery sources, such as wind, was the fact that Gas was going to be running our in our lifetime.Never has a man been heard to say on his death bed that he wishes he'd spent more time in the office.Comment
-
There must be overcapacity built into the current system already, because demand is variable and hence supply too. We just need another 20 or 30% built in, or do something smart like build the Severn Barrage, pumped storage, smart metres, buy electricity from Europe, shiver, etc.Comment
-
Aren't there a lot of problems with noise polution from wind farms? There was a couple in the Times over the weekend who couldn't sleep because of it.Comment
-
The energy gap will be a reality, and it cannot be rectified in time without a change in policy, i.e. keeping some existing coal/nuclear stations open beyond their current closure dates. This goes against EU regs though (and safety cases against the nukes).
50% (approx 7) of our coal fired power stations will be closing in the next 2-3 years due to emission regulation, age of plant and wind down of maintenance due to closure plans. One or two may re-open as purely wood burning power stations but with severely restricted output.
There are currently 3-4 gas fired power stations of similar capacity commissioning now or due for completion by the time the coalers go off line.
This gap is not significant as the drop in demand during the recession and spare capacity in the system can cover this.
The big problem is the nukes, all but one (about 7) will be decommissioned by 2023 under current plans, with their replacements not due on line until the late 2020s.
The current renewable sources and planned renewable sources have no chance to meet this shortfall. More gas stations will be required (they are quick to build - 2-3 years to get online after planning).
Looks like we will need to buy from France as they continue their nuclear programme. Oh hold the Germans are shutting their nukes so will need to buy in power as well - they will pay more than the UK.
Anyone starting a candle making business looks a good investment at the moment!
This may seem a bit bleak but the output of renewable sources just doesn't cut it. More fossil powered stations are required (more business for me!!) whether the green lobby require it otherwise their iPads will stop working.Beer
is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin FranklinComment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostThere must be overcapacity built into the current system already, because demand is variable and hence supply too. We just need another 20 or 30% built in, or do something smart like build the Severn Barrage, pumped storage, smart metres, buy electricity from Europe, shiver, etc.
£30 billion seems a tad expensive
Thorium power... that's the future!How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Originally posted by Troll View PostThe Severn Barrage was recently rejected on costs grounds
£30 billion seems a tad expensive
Thorium power... that's the future!Comment
-
The sooner bills go up to meet the price for building that extra capacity the better.
Nuclear energy is not an option our children should have to bare."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostProbably £2.99 billion of that is people filling their boots. How expensive can it be to get the unemployed to mix some earth and cement and plonk some turbines in the resulting mound and flood Wales? About thruppence?How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment