• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Billions needed for Wind farm back up"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Dearnla View Post
    There are more interconnectors going in as we speak across the channel. The latest one is to Holland National Grid: Interconnectors

    The €600 million joint venture will support security of electricity supply in both markets and will allow BritNed's customers to participate in European markets and create open access for all. BritNed will have a capacity of 1,000 MW and will be 260 km long
    €600 million / 260 km = €2300 per metre. Kerching.

    1 GW doesn't sound a lot. For comparison how much power can UK electricity pylons handle?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dearnla
    replied
    And don't forget that, as we plug in more renewable energy sources, there needs to be a whole load more power lines strung out to meet them. So Scotland gets a whole new transmission line, and then there's the one going through Shropshire (sorry, the one in consultation that might go across Shropshire...).

    It's all a bit expensive, so don't think your energy bills are going to stabilise anytime soon.

    There are more interconnectors going in as we speak across the channel. The latest one is to Holland National Grid: Interconnectors

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Probably £2.99 billion of that is people filling their boots. How expensive can it be to get the unemployed to mix some earth and cement and plonk some turbines in the resulting mound and flood Wales? About thruppence?
    Agreed ... as the UK de-skills the only available contenders with the resources for major Infrastructure projects become effectively cartels who can (& do) dream up inflated quotes knowing there is little alternative

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    The sooner bills go up to meet the price for building that extra capacity the better.

    Nuclear energy is not an option our children should have to bare.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    The Severn Barrage was recently rejected on costs grounds

    £30 billion seems a tad expensive

    Thorium power... that's the future!
    Probably £2.99 billion of that is people filling their boots. How expensive can it be to get the unemployed to mix some earth and cement and plonk some turbines in the resulting mound and flood Wales? About thruppence?

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    There must be overcapacity built into the current system already, because demand is variable and hence supply too. We just need another 20 or 30% built in, or do something smart like build the Severn Barrage, pumped storage, smart metres, buy electricity from Europe, shiver, etc.
    The Severn Barrage was recently rejected on costs grounds

    £30 billion seems a tad expensive

    Thorium power... that's the future!

    Leave a comment:


  • Coalman
    replied
    The energy gap will be a reality, and it cannot be rectified in time without a change in policy, i.e. keeping some existing coal/nuclear stations open beyond their current closure dates. This goes against EU regs though (and safety cases against the nukes).

    50% (approx 7) of our coal fired power stations will be closing in the next 2-3 years due to emission regulation, age of plant and wind down of maintenance due to closure plans. One or two may re-open as purely wood burning power stations but with severely restricted output.

    There are currently 3-4 gas fired power stations of similar capacity commissioning now or due for completion by the time the coalers go off line.

    This gap is not significant as the drop in demand during the recession and spare capacity in the system can cover this.

    The big problem is the nukes, all but one (about 7) will be decommissioned by 2023 under current plans, with their replacements not due on line until the late 2020s.

    The current renewable sources and planned renewable sources have no chance to meet this shortfall. More gas stations will be required (they are quick to build - 2-3 years to get online after planning).

    Looks like we will need to buy from France as they continue their nuclear programme. Oh hold the Germans are shutting their nukes so will need to buy in power as well - they will pay more than the UK.

    Anyone starting a candle making business looks a good investment at the moment!

    This may seem a bit bleak but the output of renewable sources just doesn't cut it. More fossil powered stations are required (more business for me!!) whether the green lobby require it otherwise their iPads will stop working.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Aren't there a lot of problems with noise polution from wind farms? There was a couple in the Times over the weekend who couldn't sleep because of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    There must be overcapacity built into the current system already, because demand is variable and hence supply too. We just need another 20 or 30% built in, or do something smart like build the Severn Barrage, pumped storage, smart metres, buy electricity from Europe, shiver, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scrag Meister
    replied
    And I thought one of the driving forces for new engery sources, such as wind, was the fact that Gas was going to be running our in our lifetime.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Bloggs
    replied
    Incredible isn't it? I knew this all along, why didn't the politicians who run the country realise this? I am amazed it has taken so long to work out that when all the present base load coal fired and nuclear plant is closed, then the lights will go out unless we have just the right kind of wind.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    started a topic Billions needed for Wind farm back up

    Billions needed for Wind farm back up

    Energy giants want billions for back-up to windfarms | This is Money

    All in a good cause.

Working...
X