Twenty years ago I was interested in alternative voting systems as a means for improving democracy. Now it seems a ridiculously old-fashioned and trivial issue. A few years ago I sat down and thought how, starting with a clean sheet, I'd design a democracy in the internet age. The exact details of what I came up with don't matter, since it was only one of many possible systems, and my point is merely to highlight how different things might look if we don't start from the status quo. In my system:-
1. There was no physical parliament, only a hierarchy of on-line forums, each forum corresponding to a geographical location. (So UK forum would have England below it, then London below that, etc.)
2. There were no general elections, you could go on-line and change your vote for the person you wanted to represent you at any time.
3. There were no political parties. This wasn't an explicit goal, it was just a side-effect that in my clean sheet approach they weren't needed. (I'm sure I could come up with equally attractive alternative systems where political parties are actually more important than they are in our antiquated reality.)
If we are just going to reform voting within our current system then I prefer the system that I think I may have posted about after the last general election: let the first-past-the-post winner represent each constituency, but introduce electronic voting within parliament and let each MPs vote there be weighted according to how his party did in the country as a whole.
From the voters point of view, this would mean that even if you didn't get the candidate you voted for, your vote would still count equally with everyone elses in parliament, as long as the party you voted for got at least one MP elected.
Based on the result of the last election, if each thousand votes cast by voters in the country as a whole resulted in one unit of voting power being allocated to that party, and all such units were equally divided between the party's MPs, I calculated that a Conservative MP would have 35 votes in parliament, a Labour MP 33, A Lib Dem 120, and the single Green MP 286. (In addition to representing her constituency, she would be representing everybody in the country who voted Green.)
This system gives proportional representation to the parties, while retaining many aspects of the simplicity of the current first-past-the-post system, from the point of view of voters, who don't have to do anything different.
1. There was no physical parliament, only a hierarchy of on-line forums, each forum corresponding to a geographical location. (So UK forum would have England below it, then London below that, etc.)
2. There were no general elections, you could go on-line and change your vote for the person you wanted to represent you at any time.
3. There were no political parties. This wasn't an explicit goal, it was just a side-effect that in my clean sheet approach they weren't needed. (I'm sure I could come up with equally attractive alternative systems where political parties are actually more important than they are in our antiquated reality.)
If we are just going to reform voting within our current system then I prefer the system that I think I may have posted about after the last general election: let the first-past-the-post winner represent each constituency, but introduce electronic voting within parliament and let each MPs vote there be weighted according to how his party did in the country as a whole.
From the voters point of view, this would mean that even if you didn't get the candidate you voted for, your vote would still count equally with everyone elses in parliament, as long as the party you voted for got at least one MP elected.
Based on the result of the last election, if each thousand votes cast by voters in the country as a whole resulted in one unit of voting power being allocated to that party, and all such units were equally divided between the party's MPs, I calculated that a Conservative MP would have 35 votes in parliament, a Labour MP 33, A Lib Dem 120, and the single Green MP 286. (In addition to representing her constituency, she would be representing everybody in the country who voted Green.)
This system gives proportional representation to the parties, while retaining many aspects of the simplicity of the current first-past-the-post system, from the point of view of voters, who don't have to do anything different.
Comment