Originally posted by Sands of Time
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Things I want to know
Collapse
X
-
Yes, because the glider pushes on air which pushes on the ground, which is what keeps the glider up. Unless you're playing word games with 'open', such that some of the weight leaks out. -
Do you get invited to many parties?Originally posted by suityou01 View PostAn interesting question. Prawn's answer of earth and neutral being the same isn't acutally that daft, although strictly speaking it is wrong.
The substation will have tap offs from the transformer, each one being a phase. As a home owner you only consume one phase, so your neutral is acutally bolted down to the return path of this phase.
Where Prawn is verging on correct is when the supply head is of TN-CS type (terra/netural combined) where the earth and neutral are both earth at the supply.
If you've ever got a pisser from a florrie circuit where some little darling has borrowed a neutral you will understand that neutral should be considered logically seperate from the earth (actually now called CPC - circuit protection conductor).
It is quite feasible to provide your own earthing conductors and use this instead of the company's one, and in section 6 of the regs (Building sites, caravans and marinas IIRC) you have to. The maximum disconnection time is also halved from 0.4 to 0.2 seconds I think.
So in short (pun intended) it is no less efficient to provide your own earthing arrangements, but neutral and earth are not the same.Comment
-
Assuming it is gliding using Bernoulli's principle the air pushes the gliderOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostYes, because the glider pushes on air which pushes on the ground, which is what keeps the glider up. Unless you're playing word games with 'open', such that some of the weight leaks out.Coffee's for closersComment
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostAssuming it is gliding using Bernoulli's principle the air pushes the glider
What happens if the glider flies into a open topped truck - below the sides?
Is there a difference if it was an inch above the surface of the truck?
Stephen Fry said something about 'being part of the same system'?
Bing!Comment
-
This only works when the conatainer with the birds in it is a sealed system. If it is then the force exerted by the birds flapping will be transmitted through the air to the truck, meaning no loss of weight. If it is not a sealed system then the force of the air will be lost to the outside and there will be a reduction in weight.Originally posted by Sands of Time View PostThere was one thing on QI the other week (Dave / Gold or whatever)
Birds in a lorry - weigh X, birds takeoff and fly in the lorry same weight.
The lorry only weighs less when they fully exit out of the lorry - why?
Bing!
As an aside, in a sealed system the birds would suffocate so wont be able to fly anyway.
No, as it is not a sealed system there is no distinction between the air inside or outside of the lorry so no change in weight would occur.Originally posted by Sands of Time View PostSo....
If the back doors were open on a large artic, on a very sensitive weigh bridge and I threw a radio controlled glider in - would it register as increased weight before it hit the 'cab' partition at the back?
Bing!"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Newtons law is best. If the glider is flying horizontally, the air will be pushing it upward with a force equal to its weight (mg). If the glider is on a downward path, the upward force (and weight felt by the truck) is slightly less. Naturally the gliders entire weight won't immediately be felt at the truck floor because of propagation delays and various air currents going up and down and swirling and whatever, so the weight of the truck will sometimes by higher and sometimes lower if using sensitive equipment, but averaged over time the weight of the truck floor will be the weight of the air plus the weight of the glider from time the plane entered the truck, before and after it hit the opposite wall.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostAssuming it is gliding using Bernoulli's principle the air pushes the gliderComment
-
The glider is held up by the inherent air pressure - there would be no extra downward forceOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostNewtons law is best. If the glider is flying horizontally, the air will be pushing it upward with a force equal to its weight (mg). If the glider is on a downward path, the upward force (and weight felt by the truck) is slightly less. Naturally the gliders entire weight won't immediately be felt at the truck floor because of propagation delays and various air currents going up and down and swirling and whatever, so the weight of the truck will sometimes by higher and sometimes lower if using sensitive equipment, but averaged over time the weight of the truck floor will be the weight of the air plus the weight of the glider from time the plane entered the truck, before and after it hit the opposite wall.
To put it another way - the air is always pushing in all directions mainly against itself but also against the floor, walls and roof of the truck. The glider separated the air and creates a localised upper layer which is pushing less in the downward direction. The lower band of air does not have to exert any extra force.Coffee's for closersComment
-
Benoulli's principle only partially explains lift. The majority of lift arise as a result of Newton's Third Law (For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction).Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostAssuming it is gliding using Bernoulli's principle the air pushes the glider
The result of the wing moving through the air is that the airflow is deflected downwards at the trailing edge of the wing. In order to deflect the air force must be exerted on it, this results in an equal upwards force on the wing. As velocity increases a greater mass of air is deflected resulting in a greater upwards force which produces more "lift"."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Yes, there air pressure is lower above the wing than below, but it's easier to think in terms of Newton. It's just lots of collisions with air molecules. As the glider moves along it pushes air molecules down and the change in momentum of those molecules results in an equal and opposite force that pushes the glider up.Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostThe glider is held up by the inherent air pressure - there would be no extra downward force
To put it another way - the air is always pushing in all directions mainly against itself but also against the floor, walls and roof of the truck. The glider separated the air and creates a localised upper layer which is pushing less in the downward direction. The lower band of air does not have to exert any extra force.
You can see this perhaps more clearly with a helicopter, which is basically lots of wings going around in a circle. I think you can see here that the force (equal to the helicopters weight) would be felt on the floor.Comment
-
All this is as chicken feed compared to the real Ultimate Question:
How do they print the white bits in the Yellow Pages?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment