Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The mini-series was good. Had enough time to actually tell the story properly, not just pick out the main plot points and hope the viewer had read the books to fill in the blanks for themselves.
"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.
In 50 years they'll probably be able to remake any film you can think of, in holographic 3D and with the same actors, computer generated.
And it still won't be as good as the book.
I've never read any of the Dune stuff, nor seen the film. I knew a lot of geologists at university and they all seemed to have the books. Of course the film hadn't been made then.
I never met anybody who liked the Dune books and thought the film was any good.
One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest was a film that was as good as a film as the book was good as a book. I still prefer the book to the film, but I think the important thing is not to try to replicate the book in film, but to actually adapt the damn thing so that it's a good film, and let the devil take the book to hell in a handcart. That's more likely to result in aficionados of the book adjudging the film to be a good film of the book. After all, they liked the book because it was a good book, so they'll like the film if it's a good film. A film that's just the book copied word-for-word into a different and unfitting medium, or a film that ends up being a completely different story with the same name, are unlikely to be any good to man or beast.
Comment