• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Jazz

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    If you want music to develop and change, you have to accept that people make experimental music that doesn't have a mass appeal. I get the impression that some modern jazz, as with some modern classical music and some modern art is actually an exploration of new ideas; the new ideas might only appeal to die-hard afficionados, but some ideas will be picked up and applied in other forms of music. That doesn't mean you have to like that music (or art), but it can be one of the reasons why it's worth making it.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      If you want music to develop and change, you have to accept that people make experimental music that doesn't have a mass appeal. I get the impression that some modern jazz, as with some modern classical music and some modern art is actually an exploration of new ideas; the new ideas might only appeal to die-hard afficionados, but some ideas will be picked up and applied in other forms of music. That doesn't mean you have to like that music (or art), but it can be one of the reasons why it's worth making it.
      It is music that goes out to be different and unpalatable to what it thinks is mainstream.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by minestrone View Post
        It is music that goes out to be different and unpalatable to what it thinks is mainstream.
        Perhaps, yes; is that a problem?
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post

          If you want music to develop and change, you have to accept that people make experimental music that doesn't have a mass appeal. I get the impression that some modern jazz, as with some modern classical music and some modern art is actually an exploration of new ideas; the new ideas might only appeal to die-hard afficionados, but some ideas will be picked up and applied in other forms of music. That doesn't mean you have to like that music (or art), but it can be one of the reasons why it's worth making it.
          True - A lot of "modern classical" music, of the kind they occasionally play on Radio 3, sounds literally like a succession of random squeaks and whistles, with the occasional clash of dustbin lids. Experts claim there are subtle rhythms, but I could never discern any patterns when I once tried listening to the insufferable stuff!

          But then in the early 19th century, old-timers complained bitterly about the unconventional, chaotic style of music being developed by people like Brahms and Mendelssohn, which went against all the Baroque principles.
          Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Perhaps, yes; is that a problem?
            They can shoot off in whatever self propelled archaic nonsense chord progression they want to go to. Jazz fans want nothing more that to be loved for their music because nobody else likes it, they are the designer clothes wearing self absorbed tarts of the music world who turn to a party and get pissed off when everyone is wearing designer clothes. If everyone was listening to jazz jazz fans would be experimenting with Kylie bootlegs.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by minestrone View Post
              They can shoot off in whatever self propelled archaic nonsense chord progression they want to go to. Jazz fans want nothing more that to be loved for their music because nobody else likes it, they are the designer clothes wearing self absorbed tarts of the music world who turn to a party and get pissed off when everyone is wearing designer clothes. If everyone was listening to jazz jazz fans would be experimenting with Kylie bootlegs.
              But now you're talking about the fans, who may or may not be tossers, just as the fans of other kinds of music may be tossers. Your original question was about the point of the music itself, which I've tried to answer in a somewhat incomplete fashion.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                They can shoot off in whatever self propelled archaic nonsense chord progression they want to go to. Jazz fans want nothing more that to be loved for their music because nobody else likes it, they are the designer clothes wearing self absorbed tarts of the music world who turn to a party and get pissed off when everyone is wearing designer clothes. If everyone was listening to jazz jazz fans would be experimenting with Kylie bootlegs.
                So what you're saying is fans of modern jazz are pretentious tossers?

                Perhaps overgeneralised, but not excessive as statements go

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                  They can shoot off in whatever self propelled archaic nonsense chord progression they want to go to. Jazz fans want nothing more that to be loved for their music because nobody else likes it, they are the designer clothes wearing self absorbed tarts of the music world who turn to a party and get pissed off when everyone is wearing designer clothes. If everyone was listening to jazz jazz fans would be experimenting with Kylie bootlegs.
                  Wow you really hate jazz music?

                  What music do you like? I'm willing to bet money that it's originated from jazz
                  "Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                    They can shoot off in whatever self propelled archaic nonsense chord progression they want to go to. Jazz fans want nothing more that to be loved for their music because nobody else likes it, they are the designer clothes wearing self absorbed tarts of the music world who turn to a party and get pissed off when everyone is wearing designer clothes. If everyone was listening to jazz jazz fans would be experimenting with Kylie bootlegs.
                    That word sums up the point of a lot of music and art.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #60
                      It's simple - Jazz is 4 people all playing a different tune....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X