Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Do Hindus make a habit of marrying their first cousins?
I bet they don't.
Which might go a long way in explanation.
Cousin marriages are not prohibited in Hinduism, Islam, Judaism and most Christian churches.
I think in parts its seen as a way of a) keeping wealth in the family and b) keeping the family happy. With a) used by the wealthy and b) used by the poor.
McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic." Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."
I can't help but see evidence for principle 3b of my simple theory of mankind at work here. If the negative perceptions of any group rises, that of other groups will fall as most have no capacity for seeing too many enemies.
Indeed not, unless you persist for n generations just to make sure of a wide range of recessive genes getting their day in the sun.
Yeah, but its all the will of Allah in the end innit? I know of a couple who are first cousins, the man's side has had 3 generations of 1st cousins marrying. The couple wonder why each of their newborn has died within weeks. I would blurt it out, but I'd touch a culture nerve now wouldn't I?
I think Hindus are prevented from doing the same for 5 generations.
All I know is that in Pakistani culture its rare to marry cross-caste. and in Mirpur its even rarer NOT to marry your first-cousin.
Indians perform better because many have come from Africa and thus were integrated there for a couple of generations. They are accustomed to making a new country home very quickly.
McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic." Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."
Define 3rd world. India and China were so defined in the 60s and 70s but I'm not sure they can be defined as such now.
And I see long-term advantages in having large populations from both countries here in the UK as those countries (parts of them anyway) become rich.
Hindus and Chinese people seem to integrate well anyway, so I'm not sure of Xog's tribal point.
It does seem to me (having lived in a Muslim area, Tower Hamlets) to be a religious problem in that the insularity and the assumed superiority complex of Islamic young men (that deep down is an inferiority complex) is to blame.
While the influx of Chinese in the middle of the 20th century may have been from the prosperous and intelligent what is coming now tends to be from the wrong end of the dining table.
Your average Chinese immigrant these days has probably paid to get in illegal, has no qualifications and will end up working as, pretty much, slave labour. A million miles away from the "Child, I want those fingers to bleed on that Stradivarius tonight or else you don't eat for 2 days" Hong Kong business set.
Comment