• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Romanian Gypsies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
    So that means an Pakistani CUK member could call someone a 'Paki' and it would be accepted ? Somehow I doubt it
    Whose is this sockie?
    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
    +5 Xeno Cool Points

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      People should stop banging on about human rights
      No they shouldn't. Human rights matter. It is a case of finding out how to balance human rights and responsibilities to society. You can't expect people to take responsibility if they have no rights. You also can't ask people to respect your rights if you don't show responsibility. Rights without responsibility are a recipe for anarchy. Responsibility without rights is tyranny. I don't want either of those situations.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        No they shouldn't. Human rights matter. It is a case of finding out how to balance human rights and responsibilities to society. You can't expect people to take responsibility if they have no rights. You also can't ask people to respect your rights if you don't show responsibility. Rights without responsibility are a recipe for anarchy. Responsibility without rights is tyranny. I don't want either of those situations.
        Does that mean anything? really? It's just drivel.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by minestrone View Post
          Does that mean anything? really? It's just drivel.
          Well, it does if you're scared tulipless of being beaten up by skinheads and the police turning a blind eye, yes.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #65
            Principles are inconvenient precisely when they are needed most.
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Well, it does if you're scared tulipless of being beaten up by skinheads and the police turning a blind eye, yes.
              What has that got to do with the theiving Romanian Gypsies?

              You are trying to take the debate to an extreme, you want me to debate skinheads and corrupt police when it is nothing to do with that. It is a favourite leftie policy, put fear into a debate where there is no fear. You wil be battering on about Kristallnacht soon.

              I would just rather we lifted these romas up and sent them back to europe.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                What has that got to do with the theiving Romanian Gypsies?

                You are trying to take the debate to an extreme, you want me to debate skinheads and corrupt police when it is nothing to do with that. It is a favourite leftie policy, put fear into a debate where there is no fear. You wil be battering on about Kristallnacht soon.

                I would just rather we lifted these romas up and sent them back to europe.
                Nonsense. I'm pointing out that 'lifting them up and sending them back' may not be a solution and might lead to more trouble than we already have. Especially if they're sent to places where gypsies are being treated like animals on a regular basis. I would like to see the problems dealt with, but I don't want to be responsible for something bloody awful and I don't want to see an endless cycle of failure being repeated.

                Nothing to do with being leftie (which I'm not), everything to do with looking at different sides of an issue before judging what to do.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Nonsense. I'm pointing out that 'lifting them up and sending them back' may not be a solution and might lead to more trouble than we already have. Especially if they're sent to places where gypsies are being treated like animals on a regular basis. I would like to see the problems dealt with, but I don't want to be responsible for something bloody awful.

                  Nothing to do with being leftie, everything to do with looking at different sides of an issue before judging.
                  We deport non EU workers every day who are 10 times as usefull to this country as these people.

                  Honestly, I am sure your happy clappy A level politics would not last long if you witnessed first hand the crime wave that these buggers are responsible for.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                    happy clappy A level politics


                    Somehow I think that if more people did an A level in politics they might understand how complex this issue really is, and has been for hundreds of years. Maybe when people grasp the complexity instead of issuing emotional rants, some kind of humane solution or process toward a decent solution might be a little closer. As it stands, we're no closer to solving the gypsy issue than 100 or 200 years ago, and actually getting further away each time the whole cycle of populist measures like mass deportations and whatever comes next starts up again.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by mich the tester View Post


                      Somehow i think that if more people did an a level in politics they might understand how complex this issue really is, and has been for hundreds of years. Maybe when people grasp the complexity instead of issuing emotional rants, some kind of humane solution or process toward a decent solution might be a little closer. As it stands, we're no closer to solving the gypsy issue than 100 or 200 years ago, and actually getting further away each time the whole cycle of populist measures like mass deportations and whatever comes next starts up again.
                      it's. Not. Our. Problem

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X