Originally posted by TestMangler
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Romanian Gypsies
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool Points -
Originally posted by minestrone View PostPeople should stop banging on about human rightsAnd what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNo they shouldn't. Human rights matter. It is a case of finding out how to balance human rights and responsibilities to society. You can't expect people to take responsibility if they have no rights. You also can't ask people to respect your rights if you don't show responsibility. Rights without responsibility are a recipe for anarchy. Responsibility without rights is tyranny. I don't want either of those situations.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostDoes that mean anything? really? It's just drivel.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Principles are inconvenient precisely when they are needed most.While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostWell, it does if you're scared tulipless of being beaten up by skinheads and the police turning a blind eye, yes.
You are trying to take the debate to an extreme, you want me to debate skinheads and corrupt police when it is nothing to do with that. It is a favourite leftie policy, put fear into a debate where there is no fear. You wil be battering on about Kristallnacht soon.
I would just rather we lifted these romas up and sent them back to europe.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostWhat has that got to do with the theiving Romanian Gypsies?
You are trying to take the debate to an extreme, you want me to debate skinheads and corrupt police when it is nothing to do with that. It is a favourite leftie policy, put fear into a debate where there is no fear. You wil be battering on about Kristallnacht soon.
I would just rather we lifted these romas up and sent them back to europe.
Nothing to do with being leftie (which I'm not), everything to do with looking at different sides of an issue before judging what to do.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNonsense. I'm pointing out that 'lifting them up and sending them back' may not be a solution and might lead to more trouble than we already have. Especially if they're sent to places where gypsies are being treated like animals on a regular basis. I would like to see the problems dealt with, but I don't want to be responsible for something bloody awful.
Nothing to do with being leftie, everything to do with looking at different sides of an issue before judging.
Honestly, I am sure your happy clappy A level politics would not last long if you witnessed first hand the crime wave that these buggers are responsible for.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View Posthappy clappy A level politics
Somehow I think that if more people did an A level in politics they might understand how complex this issue really is, and has been for hundreds of years. Maybe when people grasp the complexity instead of issuing emotional rants, some kind of humane solution or process toward a decent solution might be a little closer. As it stands, we're no closer to solving the gypsy issue than 100 or 200 years ago, and actually getting further away each time the whole cycle of populist measures like mass deportations and whatever comes next starts up again.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Originally posted by mich the tester View Post
Somehow i think that if more people did an a level in politics they might understand how complex this issue really is, and has been for hundreds of years. Maybe when people grasp the complexity instead of issuing emotional rants, some kind of humane solution or process toward a decent solution might be a little closer. As it stands, we're no closer to solving the gypsy issue than 100 or 200 years ago, and actually getting further away each time the whole cycle of populist measures like mass deportations and whatever comes next starts up again.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Five tax return mistakes contractors will make any day now… Yesterday 09:27
- Experts you can trust to deliver UK and global solutions tailored to your needs! Jan 8 15:10
- Business & Personal Protection for Contractors Jan 8 13:58
- ‘Four interest rate cuts in 2025’ not echoed by contractor advisers Jan 8 08:24
- ‘Why Should We Hire You?’ How to answer as an IT contractor Jan 7 09:30
- Even IT contractors connect with 'New Year, New Job.' But… Jan 6 09:28
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
Comment