• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

FFS £95,000-a-year benefits family

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    OK Troll feeding time.

    £95k tax free. Hmm I think I could survive with 10 kids.

    Many families I know live with 2 -3 kids on less than a third of that before tax and they do things like travel to work and pay for council tax and dental work.

    Extra kids don't cost that more, we have a constant kid population of about 6 -7 in our house for breakfast & lunch yet our food bill isn't that bad.

    How do you cut it? Well you fix it by setting a maximum benefit to 80% of the modal wage after tax (to take into account travel expenses and benefits such as dental & council tax). If it goes above that you need special dispensation from central government/quango.

    OK they won't be able to live in Chelsea but why do they need to?

    Then you make anyone on the dole do some work. Plenty of things councils / government don't do that don't require expertise so get them doing that. Make it attendance & piece work driven.

    Those with Mortgages you give them benefits to cover the mortgage but take a percentage of profit on sale. That way you recover the benefits later. Those on stupid interest rates due to previous poor credit history take over the mortgage if they default you get a cheap council house. This stops the lender selling it off cheap to their mates and the council having to house an evicted family.
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by vetran View Post
      £95k tax free. Hmm I think I could survive with 10 kids.

      Many families I know live with 2 -3 kids on less than a third of that before tax and they do things like travel to work and pay for council tax and dental work.

      Extra kids don't cost that more, we have a constant kid population of about 6 -7 in our house for breakfast & lunch yet our food bill isn't that bad.

      How do you cut it? Well you fix it by setting a maximum benefit to 80% of the modal wage after tax (to take into account travel expenses and benefits such as dental & council tax). If it goes above that you need special dispensation from central government/quango.

      OK they won't be able to live in Chelsea but why do they need to?

      Then you make anyone on the dole do some work. Plenty of things councils / government don't do that don't require expertise so get them doing that. Make it attendance & piece work driven.

      Those with Mortgages you give them benefits to cover the mortgage but take a percentage of profit on sale. That way you recover the benefits later. Those on stupid interest rates due to previous poor credit history take over the mortgage if they default you get a cheap council house. This stops the lender selling it off cheap to their mates and the council having to house an evicted family.
      I think attendance and piece work driven is something they should implement for anyone on benefits. Perhaps they could set up cloud labour centres where benefit claimants can come in and work/train/get experience..

      Maybe that will get some of them actually looking for real work if their time is taken up working anyway

      And families like this can work at home. With things like Amazon mechanical turk there's really no excuse for anyone to claim and do absolutely zilch - in a job centre or at home. ...
      "Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Jog On View Post
        I think attendance and piece work driven is something they should implement for anyone on benefits. Perhaps they could set up cloud labour centres where benefit claimants can come in and work/train/get experience..
        An excellent idea...............which will probably never be taken any further. Too much of an outcry from the handwringers I'd expect. And let's not forget the Human Rights of the "Jeremy Kyle" Generation.

        “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

        Comment


          #34
          Would anyone here employ the subjects of this discussion?

          If so, what would you have them doing?
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Would anyone here employ the subjects of this discussion?
            Yes

            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            If so, what would you have them doing?
            Sleeping Policemen. They look like naturals.
            “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
              Yes



              Sleeping Policemen. They look like naturals.


              OK, but it's a serious point; I don't like to see my taxes being spent on lazy people who don't want to go to work and sort themselves out either, but I really wonder whether there's a group of people who just can't keep up with the performance oriented economy that's dominating society, and whether there's much hope of getting them to work in an economically profitable sense of the word.

              I don´t know what to do with them, but something tells me that the social security system is one way in which the middle and upper classes buy peace; so long as the underclass are fed and housed in their sink estates, they're not out beating up wealthy people or nicking our contractormobiles.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #37
                I just had a look and there are tasks ranging form surveys, market research, testing website registration processes...

                The work is there. Some of it very unskilled and very low paid. If you forced Joe Pikey_dole_scum to spend 30 hours a week doing this stuff for minimum wage (benefits adjusted) how long do you think it would be before he decided that getting a proper job might actually be a better use of his time? Seeing as he's now working most of the day anyway....
                "Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  I don't like to see my taxes being spent on lazy people who don't want to go to work and sort themselves out either, but I really wonder whether there's a group of people who just can't keep up with the performance oriented economy that's dominating society, and whether there's much hope of getting them to work in an economically profitable sense of the word.
                  Don't think it has to be that profit-related. For example, give them their own "patch", and have them keep it litter-free, graffiti-free, and dog-muck free. Make the amount of benefit they can earn have a profit-related aspect too. Make them appreciate that whilst the rest of society is willing to help them out, they also have to reciprocate and show that they are prepared to put something back for the helping hand they are being shown.
                  “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Jog On View Post
                    I just had a look and there are tasks ranging form surveys, market research, testing website registration processes...
                    Surveys and market research require basic literacy and social skills. Testing website registration processes requires basic literacy and ability to use a computer. Believe it or not, these are skills which we take for granted, but many people among the underclass don't have those skills.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by vetran View Post
                      £95k tax free. Hmm I think I could survive with 10 kids.

                      Many families I know live with 2 -3 kids on less than a third of that before tax and they do things like travel to work and pay for council tax and dental work.

                      Extra kids don't cost that more, we have a constant kid population of about 6 -7 in our house for breakfast & lunch yet our food bill isn't that bad.

                      How do you cut it? Well you fix it by setting a maximum benefit to 80% of the modal wage after tax (to take into account travel expenses and benefits such as dental & council tax). If it goes above that you need special dispensation from central government/quango.

                      OK they won't be able to live in Chelsea but why do they need to?

                      Then you make anyone on the dole do some work. Plenty of things councils / government don't do that don't require expertise so get them doing that. Make it attendance & piece work driven.

                      Those with Mortgages you give them benefits to cover the mortgage but take a percentage of profit on sale. That way you recover the benefits later. Those on stupid interest rates due to previous poor credit history take over the mortgage if they default you get a cheap council house. This stops the lender selling it off cheap to their mates and the council having to house an evicted family.
                      Not bad. However while you maybe don't scale costs linearly with number of kids, some account should be taken based on what it actually costs... for instance to house 12 people you need a pretty big house, I think sometimes councils knock 2-3 terraced houses together which is a lot of rent.
                      If they already own a property I like your thoughts - I suppose the number of such cases is lowish but it should be remembered not everyone on benefits are 'career' claimers, some start from having jobs and it all turns to s***
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X