• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ground Zero mosque

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Its more of a controversy, or at least it should be, that the site hasn't been rebuilt with a monument yet. Its been 8 years now.

    This is all building up to Mr. Wilder's visit isn't it? I wonder what stunt he'll pull? And I just can't imagine what will happen on the 11th of Sept this year. Any guesses. Mass rioting. Stone throwing at every passing Muslim? Could get nasty.
    9 years next month!
    Coffee's for closers

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
      Its more of a controversy, or at least it should be, that the site hasn't been rebuilt with a monument yet. Its been 8 years now.

      This is all building up to Mr. Wilder's visit isn't it? I wonder what stunt he'll pull? And I just can't imagine what will happen on the 11th of Sept this year. Any guesses. Mass rioting. Stone throwing at every passing Muslim? Could get nasty.
      Well I am sure we can rule out Christians flying planes into tower blocks full of Muslims.

      Comment


        #83
        Don't disagree on the history Gibbon but those of us who don't live for centuries can't afford to take such a long term view. Leading by example is fine but we also have to stand up for own views where necessary. We also need to be alive to future threats.

        I would also point out that the fact that Christianity has improved is not any sort of proof that Islam will. A sample of two, one does x, so the other will. Not very sound stats, I'm afraid. Currently Islam is becoming more extreme worldwide not less. A major reason Christianity became more moderate was rising living standards in Christian countries, when people have a decent real life they are less likely to depend on fantasies. In an overcrowded world we cannot be sure that will happen again.

        Christianity also had the big advantage that the peaceful message of its main text, Christ's teachings, were at odds with the barbaric practices of the Church and this made it easier for reformers to challenge them. On the other hand the Prophet's words and actions were in line with the very worst of Islam as practiced in Iran. There are many moderate Muslims who are trying to reform the religion and want some passages removed from the Haddiths but they face an uphill struggle against an accepted text.

        Do we really want to gamble our future on them succeeding while letting Islam, as it is now, grow in influence in the West?
        bloggoth

        If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
        John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
          Don't disagree on the history Gibbon but those of us who don't live for centuries can't afford to take such a long term view. Leading by example is fine but we also have to stand up for own views where necessary. We also need to be alive to future threats.

          I would also point out that the fact that Christianity has improved is not any sort of proof that Islam will. A sample of two, one does x, so the other will. Not very sound stats, I'm afraid. Currently Islam is becoming more extreme worldwide not less. A major reason Christianity became more moderate was rising living standards in Christian countries, when people have a decent real life they are less likely to depend on fantasies. In an overcrowded world we cannot be sure that will happen again.

          Christianity also had the big advantage that the peaceful message of its main text, Christ's teachings, were at odds with the barbaric practices of the Church and this made it easier for reformers to challenge them. On the other hand the Prophet's words and actions were in line with the very worst of Islam as practiced in Iran. There are many moderate Muslims who are trying to reform the religion and want some passages removed from the Haddiths but they face an uphill struggle against an accepted text.

          Do we really want to gamble our future on them succeeding while letting Islam, as it is now, grow in influence in the West?
          So what do you suggest?

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by markinbrussels View Post
            Tres drôle, mais je ne suis pas fâché par les propos insolents d'un petomane professionnel.
            pfffff!

            By the way, by my reckoning I earned at least 5 eurocents in the duration of my last fart, so I'm obviously a professional petomaniac too. It's an easy way to earn a living, you should try it someday.
            Last edited by Mich the Tester; 25 August 2010, 14:26.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
              So what do you suggest?
              Take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

              Seriously though, perhaps the threat of extinction is what we need to get over all the petty squabbling. We need to track down some unfriendly aliens and start calling them names.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
                Don't disagree on the history Gibbon but those of us who don't live for centuries can't afford to take such a long term view. Leading by example is fine but we also have to stand up for own views where necessary. We also need to be alive to future threats.

                I would also point out that the fact that Christianity has improved is not any sort of proof that Islam will. A sample of two, one does x, so the other will. Not very sound stats, I'm afraid. Currently Islam is becoming more extreme worldwide not less. A major reason Christianity became more moderate was rising living standards in Christian countries, when people have a decent real life they are less likely to depend on fantasies. In an overcrowded world we cannot be sure that will happen again.

                Christianity also had the big advantage that the peaceful message of its main text, Christ's teachings, were at odds with the barbaric practices of the Church and this made it easier for reformers to challenge them. On the other hand the Prophet's words and actions were in line with the very worst of Islam as practiced in Iran. There are many moderate Muslims who are trying to reform the religion and want some passages removed from the Haddiths but they face an uphill struggle against an accepted text.

                Do we really want to gamble our future on them succeeding while letting Islam, as it is now, grow in influence in the West?
                Is not the problem Islam as a basis for running a state, as opposed to Islam itself, which clearly has a huge diversity of interpretations? I've seen plenty of places where a large muslim minority lives peacefully with others and has done so for a long time; the problems of intolerance seem to come to a head in places where Islam is given a place of privilege in governing the country.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                  Well I am sure we can rule out Christians flying planes into tower blocks full of Muslims.
                  been done already.
                  McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
                  Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Xog,

                    Agree with you're sentiment, but as SP says what can we practically do. Perscution even mild such as not allowing face veils doesn't work and only creates martyrs and further resentment. What we should be trying to do is try to bring them closer to our culture whilst allowing them the right to practice theirs as long as it is no threat to the state. We shouldn't allow them to gehettoise and create mini-states within communities. Oldham are re-jigging the school catchment areas to precisely do do this i.e. to mix people up.

                    A lot of what we fear is what we don't know. We should work with them and help them see the extremists are just like the BNP in a different cloak.
                    As you allude to poverty being a factor, I believe this is so esp with the Pakistani community. Get them better educated, better jobs and as you say they will start to see what we have on offer.

                    It won't be easy and will last longer than our lifetimes, but we must or the alternative is perscution or civil war make no mistake.
                    But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                      Well I am sure we can rule out Christians flying planes into tower blocks full of Muslims.
                      Or the jews who were caught celebrating when the planes were actually slamming into the buildings? 'Our mission was to document the event', according to one.

                      So how did the third tower come down without being struck? A massive structure in it's own right coming down in free fall like the other two.

                      If we weren't living in a fictitious age there wouldn't be such hoo haa about some G zero prayer room.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X