Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Blaze of Glory
Collapse
X
-
Ahhh, this is where you start confusing animals with sentient beings. You remind me of Baldrick. Thick as sh!t but strangely lovable. (Not in an HAB way, I was never confused!)
-
Perhaps they are. Quite a few of them are capable of passing the mirror test, for example.Originally posted by SupremeSpod View PostAhhh, this is where you start confusing animals with sentient beings. You remind me of Baldrick. Thick as sh!t but strangely lovable. (Not in an HAB way, I was never confused!)While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
I agree, that is the flaw I am pointing out in Doodab's scenario he is using to compare the two. It is not similar enough to use that as an argument for the point you make and the difference between a slow death and a squish.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostWell, I'm not sure a 3 yr old has a concept of life and death, so it probably wouldn't be a conscious decision to torture then kill. It would be a kid mucking about with something they found on the floor that wiggles, then stops wiggling.
Again I agree with this, hell didn't we all do this as kids. The point I was making is that you can't use an example of a 3 year old and worm when comparing it to bullfighting which is what you were doing.I used the earthworm because it actually happened. He didn't torture it, he played with it for a few minutes i.e. picked it up, poked it a bit etc but nothing malicious, I think even the squishing was more out of curiosity.
Re the cats, you are absolutely right. My apologies.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Again, where does this 'truth' come from? Does an animal have a 'reason for existing'?Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostAs a responsible parent, I would hope to explain to my son that animals do not exist for humans to torture.
Batter farming and bull-fighting are both done to make money and give people enjoyment... whether the enjoyment of watching or the enjoyment of eating meat more frequently if you're poor.Originally posted by sasguru View PostWhat part of "unnecessary and gratuitous" don't you understand?
No - look it upOriginally posted by MaryPoppins View PostI think you may mean sustenance?
Fine, that's a reasonable position. But about the bull you think it is appropriate to wish death on people, rather than let them choose if they object to animal cruelty or not. Which seems inconsistent. Shouldn't you wish death on those who run battery farms and those who sell the meat and those who eat the meat?I think most of us would agree that battery farming is abhorrent, and luckily, most of us are also hopefully in a position, if meat eaters, to afford to buy meat that has been farmed more responsibly.
If we choose to.
And then not to bleat (pardon the pun) on about it.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Where do we stand on burning insects with a magnifying glass? What about cats?Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
burning a cat with a magnifying glass will probably get you a scratched faceOriginally posted by d000hg View PostWhere do we stand on burning insects with a magnifying glass? What about cats?Coffee's for closersComment
-
Ok d000hg, I give up, you win.
Your badly structured and infantile counter arguments have defeated this little lady.
Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
+5 Xeno Cool PointsComment
-
I prefer to capture them under a glass and keep them trapped until they die so that I can make photos of them.Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhere do we stand on burning insects with a magnifying glass? What about cats?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
What? Cats?Originally posted by doodab View PostI prefer to capture them under a glass and keep them trapped until they die so that I can make photos of them.
Sick bastard.
Comment
-
Typical. Try to ask someone to justify their claims that something is "just wrong" and they get all huffy and insult you. You didn't even make an argument why it was wrong for me to counter.Originally posted by MaryPoppins View PostOk d000hg, I give up, you win.
Your badly structured and infantile counter arguments have defeated this little lady.
I think you word confusion continues. "Infantile" doesn't actually mean "too complicated for me to understand"
Anytime you fancy a reasoned discussion rather than an emotional outburst, happy to join you
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11


Comment