• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Blaze of Glory

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    What? Cats?

    Sick bastard.
    If you try hard the head will fit in a pint glass. Actually, with kittens you can probably get the whole thing in the glass.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
      What? Cats?
      Of course not. I don't photograph cats, there is more than enough of that on the internet already without me adding to the problem.
      While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by SofaKingdom View Post
        Your inability to articulate your reasoning and point out why you have a difference of opinion with doodab is revealing. At least other cretins like SB are conversant with a discussion.
        Another fµckwit. His poorly reasoned agument doesn't merit any more than the response he got.

        If you think comparing bullfighting to a 3 year old playing in a garden is the basis for an articulate discussion then join the other delusional cretins that abound here.
        Me, me, me...

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
          Another fµckwit. His poorly reasoned agument doesn't merit any more than the response he got.

          If you think comparing bullfighting to a 3 year old playing in a garden is the basis for an articulate discussion then join the other delusional cretins that abound here.
          The prosecution rests!

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by SofaKingdom View Post
            The prosecution rests!
            A reasoned reply
            Me, me, me...

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
              Another fµckwit. His poorly reasoned agument doesn't merit any more than the response he got.

              If you think comparing bullfighting to a 3 year old playing in a garden is the basis for an articulate discussion then join the other delusional cretins that abound here.
              You might want to google "Reductio ad absurdum"

              What seems to have bypassed you is that in comparing a bullfight to the actions of the three year old I have chosen a ridiculous example in order to highlight the extremity and ultimate indefensibility of your assertion that that "anyone who tortures and kills an animal deserves all he gets"

              I think suggesting that people who have grown up thinking that bullfighting is a noble sport, and don't consider it barbaric, deserve to be gored for watching a bullfight is hardly more defensible than bullfighting itself. You are both taking satisfaction in the suffering of another creature, and justifying it based on your own (arbitrary) concept of right and wrong. In fact, if you are of the opinion that human lives are worth more than bovine ones then cheering for the bull is arguably "worse".

              So, in summary, not only are you incapable of an "articulate discussion", you are a hypocrite as well.
              While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by doodab View Post
                So, in summary, not only are you incapable of an "articulate discussion", you are a hypocrite as well.
                And you're still a fµckwit.
                Me, me, me...

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Cliphead View Post
                  And you're still a fµckwit.
                  Why?

                  Actually, no need for you to answer that. Were you to start agreeing with me, I might feel insulted, but as you're someone who's concept of articulate discussion involves saying something dumb and defending it by abusing anyone who disagrees in the manner of a drunken teenage lout, having you consider me a "****wit" is almost certainly a good thing.
                  Last edited by doodab; 19 August 2010, 17:11.
                  While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                    Typical. Try to ask someone to justify their claims that something is "just wrong" and they get all huffy and insult you. You didn't even make an argument why it was wrong for me to counter.

                    I think you word confusion continues. "Infantile" doesn't actually mean "too complicated for me to understand"

                    Anytime you fancy a reasoned discussion rather than an emotional outburst, happy to join you
                    Fine, that's a reasonable position. But about the bull you think it is appropriate to wish death on people, rather than let them choose if they object to animal cruelty or not. Which seems inconsistent. Shouldn't you wish death on those who run battery farms and those who sell the meat and those who eat the meat?

                    I was alluding to the fact that your points are not worth replying to. However. As I have mentioned (twice), death was obviously a bit of a harsh statement. I don't wish death on anyone. Yet.

                    I think you will find you're the culprit where emotional outbursts are concerned.
                    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
                    +5 Xeno Cool Points

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins View Post
                      I think you will find you're the culprit where emotional outbursts are concerned.
                      I'm not really an emotional kind of guy. You might be confusing me with SY or Spod, I'd rather fix your problem than understand your feelings.
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X