• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Cable: we will respect Indian's ICT demands

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    What you need to figure out is the difference between an ICT and abuse of an ICT. Although that might be a little tricky for some.
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by malvolio View Post
      What you need to figure out is the difference between an ICT and abuse of an ICT. Although that might be a little tricky for some.
      Still up the arse of the PCG, Malv?

      How much are they paying you?

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
        According to the clip on Newsnight all parts of the jet will be made in India except the instrument panel.


        They obviously know their limitations.
        Wot even the jetti bits? I knew RR were doing manufacturing in Singapore - but didn't realise they had set up shop in India too
        How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          What you need to figure out is the difference between an ICT and abuse of an ICT. Although that might be a little tricky for some.
          I have been in business at a global level for decades. I know when there is a need to transfer people from one part of the world to another. I also know about wage-arbitrage too, be it transferring work abroad or moving the workers the other way. In the IT sector, I doubt if more that 1% of the ICT (and I do mean people brought in from abroad, not outsourcing) are actually legitimate. Almost all are fraudulent.

          I also understand the long-term economics of the issue at the level of the individual companies minimising costs to the national level of immediate and long-term loss of tax revenues, the destruction of wealth and talent, the disincentive for individuals to make personal investment in their skills, etc.


          Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
          Still up the arse of the PCG, Malv?

          How much are they paying you?
          The PCG has developed a cult status for some. or even
          How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

          Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
          Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

          "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by Troll View Post
            Wot even the jetti bits? I knew RR were doing manufacturing in Singapore - but didn't realise they had set up shop in India too
            I didn't either but the shear number of Bobs present at RR Filton last time I was there should have been the clue.

            The Japs like Whiskey, what British goods do rich Indians like to import?
            Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by Sysman View Post
              Lies, damn lies and statistics...

              ... and fiddling the data to fit a model...

              Originally posted by zeitghost
              Hockey stick problems?


              Both incorrect and exposing your complete ignorance I'm afraid.
              Some SAS procs require the data in a certain form - that's where SAS programming comes in - you have to summarise the data, in my case longitudinal data with multiple records per subject into one record per subject.
              The mathematics behind the model specifies exactly what you can do with the data - this is precisely to avoid coming to incorrect conclusions.

              HTh but IDI.
              Hard Brexit now!
              #prayfornodeal

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                I didn't either but the shear number of Bobs present at RR Filton last time I was there should have been the clue.

                The Japs like Whiskey, what British goods do rich Indians like to import?
                Trainer jets?
                Do keep up at the back.
                Hard Brexit now!
                #prayfornodeal

                Comment


                  #98
                  So we are going to teach them how to kill like civilised people?

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                    So we are going to teach them how to kill like civilised people?
                    The human species are killers. Always have been and, barring some evolution, always will be.
                    Hard Brexit now!
                    #prayfornodeal

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post


                      Update a spreadsheet for my boss.
                      Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                      Both incorrect and exposing your complete ignorance I'm afraid.
                      Some SAS procs require the data in a certain form - that's where SAS programming comes in - you have to summarise the data, in my case longitudinal data with multiple records per subject into one record per subject.
                      The mathematics behind the model specifies exactly what you can do with the data - this is precisely to avoid coming to incorrect conclusions.

                      HTh but IDI.
                      So a pivot table then.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X