• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Global Warming for Dummies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    There is indeed evidence that there was unusual medieval warmth in Northern Europe, and Greenland - but no evidence that it was anything more than regional, and no evidence at all of a global and synchronous warming such as is happening now.

    Here's the HSE on White Asbestos http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2002/e02010.htm
    My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
      There is indeed evidence that there was unusual medieval warmth in Northern Europe, and Greenland - but no evidence that it was anything more than regional, and no evidence at all of a global and synchronous warming such as is happening now.
      And Japan and China, with the Cherry blossoms... Guess that makes it regional in all the regions that kept records, on opposite sides of the planet and these flakes would have you believe it didn't occur in the areas that didn't write anything...

      Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
      Here's the HSE on White Asbestos http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2002/e02010.htm
      HSE are hysterical about white asbestos, as they are about many things. It is in their interests to be, normal organisational behaviour. There's quite a bit of white asbestos floating around naturally in the air, and just about anything in the concentrations that are harmful are also going to be bad for you.

      But keep up the troll, it is mildly entertaining.
      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

      Comment


        #43
        Difficult to believe that when Europe and Greenland are both warm over a period of a couple of hundred years, it was local (it was weather was it?). So was the atlantic cold then? (the Atlantic is a fairly big place), and for the Gulf Stream to be warmer wouldn't the source also be warmer (Mexico) and what about Canada? Did the prevailing Westerlies suddenly give up the ghost and funny local climates appear?

        Looks to me a global phenonemenon

        http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/2...-manipulation/

        The Big Brother approach of rewriting history, after a climate scientist discovered it, is quite incredible.

        oh and the West of Canada was warm....and maybe the pacific? (The pacific is a very big place)

        Canadian Rockies in the Medieval Warming period
        Last edited by BlasterBates; 10 March 2010, 08:51.
        I'm alright Jack

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
          I am sure that readers here are familiar with the concept of uncertainty ranges or 'error bars'
          Only since studying the "science" behind AGW.
          Funnily enough, I cannot recall Mr Gore admitting to any level of uncertainty. He was quite specific in his claims, particularly relating to things like Arctic Ice and its impending disappearance.
          “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by threaded View Post

            But keep up the troll, it is mildly entertaining.
            PJClarke = Phil Jones

            Now that he has some spare time on his hands he fills his day trolling forums trying to boltser support for AGW
            Coffee's for closers

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
              Only since studying the "science" behind AGW. :

              The idea of one of the top 5 retards on CUK "studying the science behind AGW" has just made me lose coffee over my screen.

              Hard Brexit now!
              #prayfornodeal

              Comment


                #47
                Senior scientists at the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (WITG) has rejected the Global Warming Theory and told that the Himalayas are quite safer zone on earth, where Global Warming has no role in controlling the conditions.
                http://wattsupwiththat.com/

                With the US Republican opposition party moving towards full rejection of AGW Sad that the UK will be left on its own, smothered in wind mills, trying desperately to save the earth.
                I'm alright Jack

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                  http://wattsupwiththat.com/

                  With the US Republican opposition party moving towards full rejection of AGW Sad that the UK will be left on its own, smothered in wind mills, trying desperately to save the earth.


                  Left on it's own creating hundreds of new carbon taxes purely to finance Gordon's perpetual tax and spend frenzy.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                    smothered in wind mills
                    Smothered in windmills that we have to import

                    Labours green credentials don't extend to actually manufacturing the damn things
                    Coffee's for closers

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Well, most of the land mass (and land is just 30% of the surface, remember) is in the NH, so that is where we have the richest source of historical and proxy data.

                      But, ice cores in the Antarctic and corals in the Pacific indicate that when it was warm (though not as warm as the last half of c20th) in Europe and Greenland, it was cold in the SH.

                      Besides which, spot the logical fallacy ... it was naturally warm in previous centuries, therefore recent global warming is not manmade....
                      My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X