• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Google "Phasing Out IE6 Support"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Durbs View Post
    Aye, i missed the quote in your post and assumed you had leapt immediately to threats of violence for someone suggesting Firefox was slow.

    Thought here's a man who takes his browser choice seriously!
    Confusion is a natural state of being

    Comment


      #32
      I've used Firefox for some years now - seemed to offer better protection when <ahem> 'researching' adult sites. & loved the tabbed windows before MS caught up

      Got the Brit English dictionary & McAfee add ins loaded (McAfee is prime contender for removal) & performance is good - but annoyingly when looking at say the Telegraph site it seems to go haywire and drives the system fan crazy - almost as if it's gobbling up system resources - but can't be ar5ed to investigate more
      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Troll View Post
        but can't be ar5ed to investigate more
        Ask HAB, he'll help.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Troll View Post
          I've used Firefox for some years now - seemed to offer better protection when <ahem> 'researching' adult sites. & loved the tabbed windows before MS caught up

          Got the Brit English dictionary & McAfee add ins loaded (McAfee is prime contender for removal) & performance is good - but annoyingly when looking at say the Telegraph site it seems to go haywire and drives the system fan crazy - almost as if it's gobbling up system resources - but can't be ar5ed to investigate more
          Confusion is a natural state of being

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Diver View Post
            Of course I meant items such as SFW and SFW...thinking of importing the franchise over here ....
            Last edited by Troll; 30 January 2010, 17:56.
            How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

            Comment


              #36
              Dave Shea has, "for no particular reason," compiled a list of things that were true when IE6 was released

              Comment


                #37
                Diver: What are you on? What kind of nerd gets emotionally invested over a web-browser?

                Originally posted by Diver View Post
                Obviously you are either blind deaf or too stupid to register that the majority of security issues over the past two years have been with IE.

                >DELETED<

                I use both IE and Firefox and my preference is obvious and has been posted here many times.

                Resorting to name calling from the security of anonymity is both cowardly and pathetic.

                >DELETED<
                You've defended precisely one of the 3 complaints you made: security, speed, and 'being MS'.
                And I'm not name calling. I genuinely believe you're ignorant if you use 'being MS' as an objective argument.

                I note a lot of your post is deleted. From quoted bits it appears you want to have a fist-fight over an internet browser or something?
                And on the 'security of anonymity'... seriously have you been on an internet forum before?
                Last edited by d000hg; 30 January 2010, 23:56.
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Diver View Post
                  The problem with a lot of Firefox users is that they have a tendency to install and then spend an hour or two putting in addons. I get sick and tired of removing the damned things because they then complain that it's slow.
                  Firefox is extremely fast, but slows down tremendously when they start chucking the Google addons etc into the pot.
                  On the subject, I don't agree. I have IE7 and FF3, neither has much changed out of the box and both take equivalent time to start up. Both are WAY slower than Chrome to load.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                    Diver: What are you on? What kind of nerd gets emotionally invested over a web-browser?
                    d00hg, shut up and get a life.

                    HTH
                    Confusion is a natural state of being

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                      Both are WAY slower than Chrome to load.

                      Is it Chrome that has that fancy javascript engine so javascript is pre-compiled instead of continuously being interpreted, resulting in much faster processing, or did I just dream that?
                      Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
                      Feist - I Feel It All
                      Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X