Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Maggie was right
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostIt is still his cash that he is investing in your business. So the business has a debt to repay him. His security () is the ownership of a section of something that might (
) one day repay his money and make him a profit.
You crack me up, so let's say you buy a few shares in BP during rights issue and you think this means BP will have the cash you paid for shares accounted for as debt?
There is no debt on the business, which of course needs to be run in the interests of shareholders but there is no obligation for the business to return the money.
I am not going to go into details here, but if I was in his position I'd do the same thing and be pretty chuffed about it. Not that your opinion matters in this one anyway.Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostI bet your investor votes conservative
I'll vote Conservative this year, so what, that does not mean I'll kiss Thatchers behind.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostWhich part of shares sold for cash you don't understand?
You crack me up, so let's say you buy a few shares in BP during rights issue and you think this means BP will have the cash you paid for shares accounted for as debt?
There is no debt on the business, which of course needs to be run in the interests of shareholders but there is no obligation for the business to return the money.
I am not going to go into details here, but if I was in his position I'd do the same thing and be pretty chuffed about it. Not that your opinion matters in this one anyway.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAgain, that is the responsibility of those individuals who make decisions over their own expenditure. It is quite a different matter for the government to get into debt by running out of other people's money.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI don't know, he is from Holland.
I'll vote Conservative this year, so what, that does not mean I'll kiss Thatchers behind.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhen a bank gives a mortgage it buys a share of the house.
Go look up the difference between loans (debt) and equity investments.
You owe it to me.Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostWhen a bank gives a mortgage it buys a share of the house.
Subtle, but important difference."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostGive it 6 months and do it, you'll be arrested for necrophilia.
Are you on drugs or something? I clearly said I won't do kiss her behind, yet alone do anything else.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt's a lot easier for the Govt to get in debt than for most people. If all fails it can print money, like it does now.
AtW, it’s not nice to say this, but I think you’re going to have to leave the UK soon. You see, the conservatives are going to win the next election. While trying to get public finances sorted out, they’re also probably going to do lots of things that will horrify you. They’ll probably give people school vouchers to choose the school their children attend. They might privatize big chunks of the NHS and give people a choice as to how to insure themselves against healthcare costs. They might even try to cut down on social ‘benefits’ while cutting business regulation to encourage new job creation. An just possibly, they might re-examine the tax arrangements for small businesses, including one person businesses, so as to give those businesses a better chance of investing in growth. This will be very scary for you, as you’ll have to watch as some people take sensible decisions and make a success of it, while others squander the opportunities and make their own situation worse.
I might come back.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Comment