- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
ipad poll
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThat fact alone is a blessing. The sooner Flash is killed by HTML5, the better.
How soon are we realistically looking at for HTML 5 to be supported by all popular browsers so it can take a proper foothold?
The one thing (as a primarily asp.net contractor) I really hate about .net is how they keep trying to reinvent the wheel. At the end of the day it still needs to output html and even then html that is cross browser compatible.
For that reason they can shove AJAX, MVC, JQUERY where the sun doesn't shine, I'm more than happy with standard ASP.Net 2.0 and more importantly so are the clients!Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Originally posted by PAH View PostHow soon are we realistically looking at for HTML 5 to be supported by all popular browsers so it can take a proper foothold?
The one thing (as a primarily asp.net contractor) I really hate about .net is how they keep trying to reinvent the wheel. At the end of the day it still needs to output html and even then html that is cross browser compatible.
For that reason they can shove AJAX, MVC, JQUERY where the sun doesn't shine, I'm more than happy with standard ASP.Net 2.0 and more importantly so are the clients!
Of course a good chunk of HTML5 is about properly describing existing browser behaviour in the face of things like malformed markup, so that there are guarantees of consistency across the board; it's not just about new input elements and so on.
There's a good chance that IE9 will implement at least some parts of the new spec that have managed to get to a reasonably stable state. Give it a couple of years.
I noticed that the Apple iPad page used the <video> element, for Safari and Chrome (the only ones that currently support it with H.264). YouTube now has a public beta of <video> support too (again, only for WebKit browsers supporting H.264), as do some of the not-quite-so-popular video sharing sites.Comment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThere's a good chance that IE9 will implement at least some parts of the new spec that have managed to get to a reasonably stable state. Give it a couple of years.
That's part of the problem, IE is never fully compliant so there's still fragmentation and confusion leading to websites that are neither here nor there and a multitude of bolt-on technologies that only make things worse.
Maybe that's why Apple clean up, they offer one interface, take it or leave it, no half-assed implementation of a standard. The benefit to Apple is it locks in their audience so they can charge more.
Perhaps the iPad has a bigger task at hand than being another me-too device, the task of reducing MS's market share of user interfaces so eventually MS will have to conform and then we'll get one standard and everyone working to it. One can dream.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Even putting aside my general dislike for apple products (nothing to do with the products themselves, more to do with the "control freak" nature of apple, if I paid for something I want to do whatever I want with it) can see no real market for the ipad as it currently stands beyond the fanboys and those with money to waste. It's just basically an oversized itouch, now if they had done a Mac in tablet form.....
Hopefully the other companies will take full advantage of this cock up and come up with something 10 times better before apple have a chance to get it right in a ipad generation or twoLast edited by Not So Wise; 28 January 2010, 10:55.Comment
-
Originally posted by Not So Wise View PostEven putting aside my general dislike for apple products (nothing to do with the products themselves, more to do with the "control freak" nature of apple, if I paid for something I want to do whatever I want with it) can see no real market for the ipad as it currently stands beyond the fanboys and those with money to waste. It's just basically an oversized itouch, now if they had done a Mac in tablet form.....
Hopefully the other companies will take full advantage of this cock up and come up with something 10 times better before apple have a chance to get it right in a ipad generation or two
Why anyone would buy a computing device without USB capability these days I just don't comprehend.
Apple are excellent at the marketing game.Comment
-
Originally posted by Not So Wise View PostEven putting aside my general dislike for apple products (nothing to do with the products themselves, more to do with the "control freak" nature of apple, if I paid for something I want to do whatever I want with it) can see no real market for the ipad as it currently stands beyond the fanboys and those with money to waste. It's just basically an oversized itouch, now if they had done a Mac in tablet form.....
Hopefully the other companies will take full advantage of this cock up and come up with something 10 times better before apple have a chance to get it right in a ipad generation or twoComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Today 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
Comment