"Again, read Dawkins book - properly"
"Again, read the Koran - properly"
"Again, read the Bible - properly"
"Again, read the Bhagavad Gita - properly"
Anyone who doesn't accept 100% everything that Dawkins says, and presents an alternative view is, according to you, a religious apologist. Like any true believer, you've got your holy book, you've got your great teacher, who's never to be questioned. I should have known better than to try to engage in rational discussion with a fundamentalist.
"Again, read the Koran - properly"
"Again, read the Bible - properly"
"Again, read the Bhagavad Gita - properly"
Anyone who doesn't accept 100% everything that Dawkins says, and presents an alternative view is, according to you, a religious apologist. Like any true believer, you've got your holy book, you've got your great teacher, who's never to be questioned. I should have known better than to try to engage in rational discussion with a fundamentalist.

Comment