No messing about on this thread

**Drewster** · 2 July 2009, 12:14

Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

Only scientifically verified reasoned responses backed by reams of data allowed.

TIA.

OK.... errrr (Ref: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page)

**DiscoStu** · 2 July 2009, 12:16

Cybertory is a twunt. For verifiable evidence please refer to any of his previous posts.

**Churchill** · 2 July 2009, 12:17

After due consideration, bollocks!

**Drewster** · 2 July 2009, 12:17

Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post

Cybertory is a twunt. For verifiable evidence please refer to any of his previous posts.

CyberTwunt is a Tory - Shirley?
(Ref: What DiscoStu said)

**sweetandsour** · 2 July 2009, 12:23

Originally posted by Churchill View Post

After due consideration, bollocks!

I don't think that you are qualified to make that judgement.

**ace00** · 2 July 2009, 12:24

( www.wikipedia.com )

**HairyArsedBloke** · 2 July 2009, 12:26

Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

Only scientifically verified reasoned responses backed by reams of data allowed.

TIA.

This quantum reality is fundamentally unstable and was never meant to be.

Just compare it to all the others - ah, I might have a problem with that bit.

**Pondlife** · 2 July 2009, 12:27

Originally posted by sweetandsour View Post

I don't think that you are qualified to make that judgement.

Are you suggesting that Churchill has been "fixed" by his owners.

I have no verifiable evidence whatsoever on this subject but I know of a lass that does.

**sweetandsour** · 2 July 2009, 12:32

Originally posted by Pondlife View Post

Are you suggesting that Churchill has been "fixed" by his owners.

I have no verifiable evidence whatsoever on this subject but I know of a lass that does.

I don't really know but surely it can be fixed with a bit of

Doesn't that work with everything?

No messing about on this thread