No messing about on this thread

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Mich the Tester replied

2 July 2009, 12:38
Science; my favourite bit
Leave a comment:
sweetandsour replied

2 July 2009, 12:32
Originally posted by Pondlife View Post

Are you suggesting that Churchill has been "fixed" by his owners.

I have no verifiable evidence whatsoever on this subject but I know of a lass that does.

I don't really know but surely it can be fixed with a bit of

Doesn't that work with everything?
Leave a comment:
Pondlife replied

2 July 2009, 12:27
Originally posted by sweetandsour View Post

I don't think that you are qualified to make that judgement.

Are you suggesting that Churchill has been "fixed" by his owners.

I have no verifiable evidence whatsoever on this subject but I know of a lass that does.
Leave a comment:
HairyArsedBloke replied

2 July 2009, 12:26
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

Only scientifically verified reasoned responses backed by reams of data allowed.

TIA.

This quantum reality is fundamentally unstable and was never meant to be.

Just compare it to all the others - ah, I might have a problem with that bit.
Leave a comment:
ace00 replied

2 July 2009, 12:24
( www.wikipedia.com )
Leave a comment:
sweetandsour replied

2 July 2009, 12:23
Originally posted by Churchill View Post

After due consideration, bollocks!

I don't think that you are qualified to make that judgement.
Leave a comment:
Drewster replied

2 July 2009, 12:17
Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post

Cybertory is a twunt. For verifiable evidence please refer to any of his previous posts.

CyberTwunt is a Tory - Shirley?
(Ref: What DiscoStu said)
Leave a comment:
Churchill replied

2 July 2009, 12:17
After due consideration, bollocks!
Leave a comment:
DiscoStu replied

2 July 2009, 12:16
Cybertory is a twunt. For verifiable evidence please refer to any of his previous posts.
Leave a comment:
Drewster replied

2 July 2009, 12:14
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

Only scientifically verified reasoned responses backed by reams of data allowed.

TIA.

OK.... errrr (Ref: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page)
Leave a comment:
DimPrawn started a topic No messing about on this thread

2 July 2009, 12:12
No messing about on this thread

Only scientifically verified reasoned responses backed by reams of data allowed.

TIA.
Tags: None