85 Sharia courts in the UK

[Menelaus]

Is that a state that likes very hot Japanese Horseraddish.

Oh no that is Wassabist

Taxi.........

Coat for blackenedbiker?

[BlackenedBiker]

Shut up big nose...

Who you calling Big Nose

[Cyberman]

As I said, we are sleepwalking to an Islamic state and sharia is incompatible with human rights and our democracy and laws:


Polygamy is now more or less accepted.

Treating women as second-class citizens is accepted... muslim married women have to accede to sex on demand. This is totally against the Human Rights Act.

Intimidation is rife in Sharia whereas in law especially this should be totally unacceptable. The courts are behind closed doors which means that fairness or intimidation is impossible to check, whereas British Courts are open to the public to ensure that justice is seen to be done.

No muslim woman may marry a muslim man unless he converts to lslam and children can be confiscated until she marries a muslim.

A male child belongs to the father after it is the age of seven, regardless of circumstances.

[ace00]

....CyberFool really needs to get stoned

Is that a cunning play on words ?

[The Lone Gunman]

As I said, we are sleepwalking to an Islamic state and sharia is incompatible with human rights and our democracy and laws:<snip>

So you would use the human rights act and democracy to remove a Muslims human and democratic right to freedom of religion?
Just because Islamic values do not meet your values you must not make the mistake of denying a Muslims right to live by them.

[NotAllThere]

So you would use the human rights act and democracy to remove a Muslims human and democratic right to freedom of religion?...

I would. Insofar as the right to freedom to practice certain aspects of religion goes against other fundemental human rights.

[lilelvis2000]

As I said, we are sleepwalking to an Islamic state and sharia is incompatible with human rights and our democracy and laws:


Polygamy is now more or less accepted.

Treating women as second-class citizens is accepted... muslim married women have to accede to sex on demand. This is totally against the Human Rights Act.

Intimidation is rife in Sharia whereas in law especially this should be totally unacceptable. The courts are behind closed doors which means that fairness or intimidation is impossible to check, whereas British Courts are open to the public to ensure that justice is seen to be done.

No muslim woman may marry a muslim man unless he converts to lslam and children can be confiscated until she marries a muslim.

A male child belongs to the father after it is the age of seven, regardless of circumstances.

Where do you get this drivel anyway? The "courts" are nothing more than arbitration and pretty well every arbitration system I know of is done in private.


I can't believe the amount of postings created by some half-brain racist twat who doesn't like 2% of the population to have a arbitration system which follows their relegious beliefs..their relegious beliefs which they have every entitlement to follow. How Ironic that you would use the Human Rights Act to restrict the Human Rights of people you don't like.

Bizarre.

[Cyberman]

So you would use the human rights act and democracy to remove a Muslims human and democratic right to freedom of religion?
Just because Islamic values do not meet your values you must not make the mistake of denying a Muslims right to live by them.

You can't have it both ways. Either you have law or you don't. If Islam conflicts with the human rights act and their followers can ignore it then why shouldn't I also ignore it.

[Cyberman]

Where do you get this drivel anyway? The "courts" are nothing more than arbitration and pretty well every arbitration system I know of is done in private.


I can't believe the amount of postings created by some half-brain racist twat who doesn't like 2% of the population to have a arbitration system which follows their relegious beliefs..their relegious beliefs which they have every entitlement to follow. How Ironic that you would use the Human Rights Act to restrict the Human Rights of people you don't like.

Bizarre.

I would use the Human Rights Act ? That is indeed bizarre, as I thought the HRA is something that I and every law abiding citizen had to conform to. Crazy Booby !!

[lilelvis2000]

You can't have it both ways. Either you have law or you don't. If Islam conflicts with the human rights act and their followers can ignore it then why shouldn't I also ignore it.

You probably do....how often do to speed, drop litter, lie on your income tax return?