• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

E, them were the days

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes View Post
    these drug threads always break down to two polarities:-

    1) Those who have taken drugs and realised that they are mostly harmless and pretty well everything you hear in the media about drugs is false.

    2) Those who haven't taken drugs, and trot out the same amusing but sad lines i.e.
    • I once heard about this guy who took his first pill and exploded
    • I read some research somewhere that said ecstacy may cause long term problems
    • I don't need to take drugs to have a good time
    • drugs are evil and all drug dealers should be shot


    Sterotyping again there, I know of many people who have become addicted to taking coke/speed/ecstacy etc, it may be a social addiciton, but without exception each one of them had been on a downward spiral. Depresion anxiety, suicidal thoughts being common symptoms, these not only have an effect on the 'addict' but also the people arround them. Of course there is then the thousands of pound they have wasted on it. Some people can control drug taking, many cannot.
    The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

    But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
      Sterotyping again there, I know of many people who have become addicted to taking coke/speed/ecstacy etc, it may be a social addiciton, but without exception each one of them had been on a downward spiral. Depresion anxiety, suicidal thoughts being common symptoms, these not only have an effect on the 'addict' but also the people arround them. Of course there is then the thousands of pound they have wasted on it. Some people can control drug taking, many cannot.
      As well as being anti drugs you are now a doctor who can diagnose depresion, anxiety and suicidal tendancies. Can I ask what medical school you graduated from?

      E is completely non adictive, coke yes, highly but E no.

      Comment


        #53
        One of the most addictive substances, more addictive than heroin or alcohol, is nicotine.

        Normally, your body produces nicotinic acid to stop nerves from firing when they don't need to. When you smoke, your body stops production- it doesn't to, it's getting all the nicotine it needs from the cigarettes. But when you stop the cigarettes, your body still needs nicotine, so your nerves keep firing. And that's why you feel so crap. It takes a while for the body to produce nicotinic acid by itself.

        That's the physical addiction. Mental addication doesn't vary from substance to substance. Given the humans can get addicted to hand washing (Obessive compulsive disorder) it seems to me really stupid to suggest that "E isn't addictive".

        Now, suddenly stopping alcohol (though not heroin, but I could be wrong), can kill, if you are physically adicated. And suddenly stopping cigarettes won't. But still, AIUI, nicotine is one of the hardest substances to break free from.

        E may not be physically addictive. And MOST alcohol addicts aren't physically addicted - but it still ****s up their lives.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          #54
          Notable by its absence in this debate - the pyschoactives - Psylocibe (Mushrooms) LSA (Morning Glory) Mescaline , DMT - none of these are addictive- can be grown and cultivated so that there is no money therefore no criminals involved - are non-addictive - cause no damage.

          As to the debate as long as we have Alcohol and Tobacco , both devastating drugs , legal this negates the debate of the other illegal drugs.

          Drugs wont change you
          Time won't change you
          Money won't change you

          I haven't got the faintest idea
          Everything seems to be up in the air at this time



          I need something you change your mind

          Politics won't change you
          Religion won't change you
          Science won't change you

          Looks like I can't change you
          I try to talk to you
          to make things clear
          but you're not even listening to me...
          And it comes directly from my heart to you...

          I need something to change your mind.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
            ...are non-addictive - cause no damage.
            That seem to be a non-sequitur. Cyanide isn't addictive, but it causes death quite quickly.

            Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
            ...Religion won't change you...
            I've known plenty of people who've been changed by religion.
            Last edited by NotAllThere; 15 February 2009, 19:24.
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
              One of the most addictive substances, more addictive than heroin or alcohol, is nicotine.

              Normally, your body produces nicotinic acid to stop nerves from firing when they don't need to. When you smoke, your body stops production- it doesn't to, it's getting all the nicotine it needs from the cigarettes. But when you stop the cigarettes, your body still needs nicotine, so your nerves keep firing. And that's why you feel so crap. It takes a while for the body to produce nicotinic acid by itself.

              That's the physical addiction. Mental addication doesn't vary from substance to substance. Given the humans can get addicted to hand washing (Obessive compulsive disorder) it seems to me really stupid to suggest that "E isn't addictive".

              Now, suddenly stopping alcohol (though not heroin, but I could be wrong), can kill, if you are physically adicated. And suddenly stopping cigarettes won't. But still, AIUI, nicotine is one of the hardest substances to break free from.

              E may not be physically addictive. And MOST alcohol addicts aren't physically addicted - but it still ****s up their lives.
              All due respect, but it seems that your argument has been irretrivably distorted by your friend's illness.

              As i said originally, these threads always polarise views.

              "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


              Thomas Jefferson

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                That seem to be a non-sequitur. Cyanide isn't addictive, but it causes death quite quickly.



                I've known plenty of people who've been changed by religion.
                None of the pyschoactives I have mentioned, and cyandide not being classed pyschoactive - will do harm mentally nor physically.

                In fact pyschoactives have been used to help to cure alcoholcs and given some profound insight - some visions - some the sacrament of Love.


                As for Religion - I guess Marx got it about right - Religion is the Opium of the People.

                The biggest drug of all - probably.
                Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 15 February 2009, 20:05.

                Comment


                  #58
                  The thing with Heroin though, is that it's a bit moreish.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Ruprect View Post
                    All due respect, but it seems that your argument has been irretrivably distorted by your friend's illness...
                    Not my friend. Cousin in fact. But I'm not from a close knit family. I just consider him this guy I know who took E once and ended up a nutter. I don't even link his illness with the drug, except I recall reading in some vested interest magazine, like New Scientest, that there is a relationship between taking E and developing schizophrenia, if you have low serotinin levels. It may well be that later studies have shown it to be entirely harmless. But the state and pharma controlled scientific journals obviously have been prevented from publishing that.

                    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
                    None of the pyschoactives I have mentioned, and cyandide not being classed pyschoactive....
                    Good point, well presented. Can anyone think of psychoactive substance that is fatal in smallish doses, so I can back my argument up? There must be some! Hyoscyamine?

                    Originally posted by Dante View Post
                    The thing with Heroin though, is that it's a bit moreish.


                    I find it thoroughly entertaining that people who are pro-drug, consider anyone who proposes a counter argument to have a vested interest. Frankly, I couldn't give a flying **** what you choose to injest, so long as it doesn't affect me or my family. If it was all legalised tomorrow, I really don't care. It seems such a minority interest.
                    Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                      But the state and pharma controlled scientific journals obviously have been prevented from publishing that
                      Well we agree on something.

                      I am not pro-drugs, or anti-drugs. I just get a bit more animated in drugs threads because its a great subject for making normally intelligent people descend into ignorance and (worse) start quoting from the mainstream press - notoriously biased when it comes to reporting on drugs. So forgive me on the stereotyping, it just happens that way.

                      Sorry bout your cousin but I will remain sceptical - if one 100mg dose of MDMA can trigger a psychological breakdown I think its safe to say it was going to happen anyway, perhaps the next time he had too much aspirin or codein.

                      And yes in relation to the nicotine argument - I have had no addiction problems with the drugs i've tried - coke, meth, E etc, but I still struggle with giving up the old fags.

                      So, govt approved (legal) drugs like alcohol and ciggies are the two biggest killers (and life ruiners) in our society by a long way. Next down the list - legal drugs from big pharma. somewhere close to the bottom of the list you'll find E.

                      Go figure.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X