Originally posted by FSM with Cheddar
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This is so wrong !!
Collapse
X
-
Yes he does, but Moses puts it into the back of the net with a header.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation! -
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYes, you would.
Which is why I find it sad that people would rather kids rot in a care home than be put in a loving, stable relationship. However, I expect nothing less from the Daily Heil readers on here, who obviously believe everything they read in the press.
In this case, the grandparents wanted to take the children into their care, so there is no chance that these kids would have remained in care, but for the decisions of over-zealous and even vindictive authorities.
There are also very many couples that want to adopt but are rejected for spurious reasons such as age, and the 'shortage' is caused by the authorities seeking 'perfect' couples. It does defeat me though how two men in a homosexual relationship can be classed as a perfect couple for the purposes of looking after a young girl and boy.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Well, apparently you don't want to believe everything you read in the press...Originally posted by minestrone View PostThe grandparents already had the children from birth from what I have read today.Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Originally posted by ratewhore View PostWell, apparently you don't want to believe everything you read in the press...
I'm pretty sure bearing in mind that it is front page news that the facts would be disputed by the authorities if they were incorrect.
Comment
-
I don't disagree. My post was subtle irony...Originally posted by Cyberman View PostI'm pretty sure bearing in mind that it is front page news that the facts would be disputed by the authorities if they were incorrect.
Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Originally posted by ratewhore View PostI don't disagree. My post was subtle irony...
It really was subtle !!
Comment
-
This isnt wrong! It ******* appalling! There's no way homos should be allowed to adopt kids.
Im adopted myself. The thought that if this was allowed years ago that I could have been placed with a couple of queers makes my flesh creep.
Its just so wrong homosexuality is 'encouraged' nowadays.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!
Comment
-
OH ..MY ..GOD
The homophobes are just disgusting.
Hopefully, they'll be too busy being angry to breed with anybody with genes that matter.Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostThis isnt wrong! It ******* appalling! There's no way homos should be allowed to adopt kids.
Im adopted myself. The thought that if this was allowed years ago that I could have been placed with a couple of queers makes my flesh creep.
Its just so wrong homosexuality is 'encouraged' nowadays.
I have no issue with homosexuals per se, but I agree that it is fundamentally wrong to allow them to adopt children. How they can be deemed as lower risk parents than the actual grandparents beggars belief.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment