• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

This is so wrong !!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    It gets worse, apparently the goverment is starting a witchhunt finding unoffical adoptions by friends, relatives and grandparents.
    But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      There is specific reason why they cannot have children and until they understand what hole the mole goes in to make babies they should not be given children and certainly not before family members who have raised the children from birth.

      If I was one of those children farmed out to an Alan Carr type and his gimp or a couple of shaven headed dungaree wearing carpet licking vegans I would be hiring a legal council as soon as I was of age for compensation for the pain inflicted by state sponsored child abuse.
      I'm sure that the Catholic adoption agency could find you somewhere with a nice, safe priest to live with.
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
        It gets worse, apparently the goverment is starting a witchhunt finding unoffical adoptions by friends, relatives and grandparents.
        Darth Brown is looking for his twins.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by minestrone View Post
          There is specific reason why they cannot have children and until they understand what hole the mole goes in to make babies they should not be given children and certainly not before family members who have raised the children from birth.

          If I was one of those children farmed out to an Alan Carr type and his gimp or a couple of shaven headed dungaree wearing carpet licking vegans I would be hiring a legal council as soon as I was of age for compensation for the pain inflicted by state sponsored child abuse.
          He won't think it's wrong, not after he has been brought up by his new "family".

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by minestrone View Post
            Darth Brown is looking for his twins.
            Post of the day!

            Comment


              #26
              Yes, because the Daily Mail is well known for producing well balanced, politically independant quality journalism, and not for pandering to the emotions of the bigoted and ill informed masses.

              Social Services will try everything before removing a child from a family, even if this is using extended family, such as Grandparents, as confirmed by various friends and family of mine who work in socail services. Granted this can result in children suffering more in certain circumstances, but it's a judgement call and they can't get it right everytime.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by jmo21 View Post

                if god forbid something happened to me and the missus, and my folks (or my missus folks) were not allowed to adopt, and were then told you'll only see the kiddie twice a year, it would probably finish my old mum off
                You don't need to worry. The child welfare agency will always try and relocate the children with the closest member of family possible. It takes an extreme case for the children to be completely removed from all family members i.e. Saftey of children.

                The daily muck has not given all the facts in this case. - Unfortunately we won't ever know the facts, as the current courts are held in secret.
                Originally posted by cailin maith
                Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar??

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                  There is specific reason why they cannot have children and until they understand what hole the mole goes in to make babies they should not be given children
                  Adoption has got nothing to do with the capability of having children. It is about providing the children with a loving and stable family. If a same sex couple can provide that, then why not?

                  Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                  and certainly not before family members who have raised the children from birth.
                  They don't you idiot The agencies try everything they possibly can to keep the child with the parents, and failing that with the closest family possible.
                  Originally posted by cailin maith
                  Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar??

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by the_duderama View Post
                    Yes, because the Daily Mail is well known for producing well balanced, politically independant quality journalism, and not for pandering to the emotions of the bigoted and ill informed masses.

                    Social Services will try everything before removing a child from a family, even if this is using extended family, such as Grandparents, as confirmed by various friends and family of mine who work in socail services. Granted this can result in children suffering more in certain circumstances, but it's a judgement call and they can't get it right everytime.


                    I would think that the majority of the UK population believe that they have got this wrong. It is more about achieving quotas for reasons of political correctness and nothing to do with child welfare.
                    This decision is on a par with the incompetence of Haringey council and the series of child deaths IMO.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      How long before we find out that granddad is a convicted peado?
                      Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X