This is so wrong !!

[scooterscot]

This goes beyond understanding. Is common sense now against the law?

[minestrone]

There used to be Catholic adoption agencies that would link up Catholic children to Catholic families but they were then forced to give children to gay parents so most of them ended up shutting.

In that repsect you could say you have more rights to your sexual freedom in this country than to your religious freedom.

[milanbenes]

minestrone,

this is excellent....

'If they really want to have children then I suggest they buy a biology book and work out from the diagrams what goes where.'



Milan.

[expat]

This goes beyond understanding. Is common sense now against the law?

Yes. The government will make the decisions for you.

[FSM with Cheddar]

religious freedom.

The repression of anyone that doesn't fit into your dogmatic and bigoted club rules.

[TheFaQQer]

There used to be Catholic adoption agencies that would link up Catholic children to Catholic families but they were then forced to give children to gay parents so most of them ended up shutting.

In that repsect you could say you have more rights to your sexual freedom in this country than to your religious freedom.

Not quite. They were forced to change their biggotted policies so that they could no longer refuse adoption purely on the grounds of sexual orientation.

That's somewhat different from how you and the Daily Heil have portrayed it, though.

[ratewhore]

I often feel that way about the Daily Mail, too.

I read it in the Telegraph...

[jmo21]

me and the missus are pregnant and can't wait for out little baby to arrive

I'm an only child myself, and the look of sheer joy on my mum's face (and my dad's too, although in a lesser, stoic manly proud way) made it all the more exciting.

if god forbid something happened to me and the missus, and my folks (or my missus folks) were not allowed to adopt, and were then told you'll only see the kiddie twice a year, it would probably finish my old mum off

[TheFaQQer]

I read it in the Telegraph...

Wherever it was, there was never a case of forcing them to give children to gay parents. They just aren't allowed to refuse to allow adoption based purely on sexual orientation.

[minestrone]

Not quite. They were forced to change their biggotted policies so that they could no longer refuse adoption purely on the grounds of sexual orientation.

That's somewhat different from how you and the Daily Heil have portrayed it, though.

There is specific reason why they cannot have children and until they understand what hole the mole goes in to make babies they should not be given children and certainly not before family members who have raised the children from birth.

If I was one of those children farmed out to an Alan Carr type and his gimp or a couple of shaven headed dungaree wearing carpet licking vegans I would be hiring a legal council as soon as I was of age for compensation for the pain inflicted by state sponsored child abuse.