Originally posted by Solidec
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Solution to Israel - Hamas conflict poll
Collapse
X
-
Yep. Nasty I know, but I don't see any other way.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Comment
-
AndyW?Originally posted by ratewhore View PostThe Israelis should hire a good PR company...And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
End Tony Blairs vacation and urge him to create a Middle East Peace Focus group to explore possible solutions in a cost effective way.Comment
-
Israel should just reclaim the 1967 land and stop wasting time giving it back when all they get as thanks are rockets from the ungrateful people who move into those landsComment
-
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostEnd Tony Blairs vacation and urge him to create a Middle East Peace Focus group
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
You originally said that Israel should give back the stolen land. But it wasn't stolen from the Palestinians. It was stolen from Egypt, Syria and Jordan. So they should give it back to those country. Then Egypt, Syria and Jordan can give the land to the Palestinians. But they won't do that. As they didn't before 1967.Originally posted by Pickle2 View PostNo, I mean give the land to the Palestinian people....Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
I think things can be solved.
If it went back to the Pickle2 solution, hamas would be marginalised. They are a reaction to Israel's aggression / crimes, rather than being based on any true ideology.
There will always be some nutters that want to destroy a country, and that is what the secret services are for. Full blown destruction of civilian infrastructure will just promote radicalism.
At the moment I don't think Israel (or Zionist sympathisers (USA)) want peace.Originally posted by cailin maithHang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar??
Comment
-
say, didn't Ben Netanyahu(sp?) show a map with a huge Israel and his vision was that Israel would one day encompasss all that area?
What I'd like to know is that there are Arabs living in Israel..so what is the problem with simply absorbing the Palestinians into Israel. Oh yeah...then it would cease to be a Jewish land. And there would be about 3 million Arabs on the dole....settlers would lose their right to shoot Arabs on sight.
What a shame.McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
-
No, you are not listening. Im saying that they should bypass Egypt, Syria and Jordan, and give the land stolen in 1967 (that WAS under control of those countries) and give it directly to the Palestinian people. If they want peace, they need to create the peace. And that means sacrificing all of their spoils of that war. Whether they started the war or not. In fact, they need to go further than that to help create a valid and functional Palestinian state. See my point about a land corridor between Gaza and the west bank.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostYou originally said that Israel should give back the stolen land. But it wasn't stolen from the Palestinians. It was stolen from Egypt, Syria and Jordan. So they should give it back to those country. Then Egypt, Syria and Jordan can give the land to the Palestinians. But they won't do that. As they didn't before 1967.
But I think the expansionist nature and the rediculous idea of some kind of biblical ancestral right to the land of the Zionist people means they just cant stomach the thought of doing what is needed to create peace.
To create two states, where only one currently exsists, means that that one state in question will have to make sacrafices. There can be no other way. How else can you make two from one?The Mods stole my post count!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Today 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Yesterday 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45

Comment