Dumb question: what is SAP

[Francko]

in defense of Frankie all of them could be on SAP, if they were part of a chain and using a centrally managed system. I doubt though that a contract for working on the SAP system would require you to be located in that village. Most likely you would be located in Central London as that is where all the chains they would be part of have their HQ.

I work on a SAP system every day that are used by workers all over the world, that does not mean I have to sit in Ukraine or the Philliphines just because the user with a problem is there.

If the branch has some authonomy in the business processes (and normally it is) there is no other way then doing the analysis on-site. Besides, there are plenty of companies located outside big towns with no head-quarters. And yes, most of them have a SAP system in-house because of the strategic importance and the strong relation with the business, but they probably outsource the rest of IT functions. A portal or an expensive core functional system is most likely instead located centrally at the headquarter or outsourced to a major company (located in a big town).

[Sysman]

this argument about companies having to change their business processes to fit the erp systems

this is a real phylosophical argument with many sides

there are companies who have processes in place, why do they do things that way.... because they always have, is it the best way.... they don't know

many companies would do well to have a look at their business processes and compare them to the erp standards and see what the fit gaps are and whether there are positive or negative reasons for the gaps

of course the erp systems are infinately customisable and can be changed to fit any business and these kinds of projects changing erp to fit some company set in its ways can be the most lucrative because of all the customisation work

but at the same time, companies would do well to take an open minded look at how they do things and whether they really are the best ways or simply because that's the way the lazy sods have always done it

no skin off my nose either way

to the question about the profitability of the chocolate factory, from the little I know they are doing very well

Milan.

Way back when, when I first started this IT lark and the computers we worked on cost several times the total of the entire IT staff's own houses put together, we were taught to get the business processes right before we even considered computerizing them.

Since the cost of development long ago outstripped the cost of the tin it gets done on, we should be just as conscious of getting the business requirements set out clearly and formulated into an efficient process as back in those days.

It's a shame, but it seems to me that this isn't taught this any more.

[ThomasSoerensen]

If the branch has some authonomy in the business processes (and normally it is) there is no other way then doing the analysis on-site. Besides, there are plenty of companies located outside big towns with no head-quarters. And yes, most of them have a SAP system in-house because of the strategic importance and the strong relation with the business, but they probably outsource the rest of IT functions. A portal or an expensive core functional system is most likely instead located centrally at the headquarter or outsourced to a major company (located in a big town).

I disagree a lot with this. Maybe this is true for small scale systems, but it is not true for SAP.

[NotAllThere]

Certainly Francko's view is completely outside my over ten years of experience.

And I can spell "Automony" The trick is, in recognising the prefix "auto". Maybe it was confused with autochtone.

[ThomasSoerensen]

Certainly this view is completely outside my over ten years of experience.

And I can spell "Automony" The trick is, in recognise the prefix "auto". Maybe it was confused with autochtone.

I don't follow. Which "view" are you referring to?

[NotAllThere]

I don't follow. Which "view" are you referring to?

Edited my post, but it should have been obvious with my reference to Autonomy.

[Francko]

Certainly Francko's view is completely outside my over ten years of experience.

And I can spell "Automony" The trick is, in recognising the prefix "auto". Maybe it was confused with autochtone.

Aber Ich kann Deutsch sicher besser buchstabieren.

Sorry not sure which view is totally outside? Care to explain or you just like single-line conversations?

Sorry Thomas I might have put some confusion before. What I just meant is that it's more likely that you have some possible customisation work on a SAP system at a local branch or a small company because the first thing that each company need is an ERP. Without that you are doomed to fail. Then come all the other integration systems (and most of the small companies don't have any, simply because they can't afford them or they don't need them). Here why you might still find SAP contracts in less popular locations. I'd also think that a very important thing for a SAP analyst (I never worked on it but on a team we often worked side-by-side) is that he doesn't limit himself to only read reports and process-manuals but actually go and talk to the main business actors. Perhaps I got the wrong impression.

[NotAllThere]

Ok, that's possibly true for analysis/gap analysis/gathering requirements, but that's a small part of SAP work.

[ThomasSoerensen]

Ok, that's possibly true for analysis/gap analysis/gathering requirements, but that's a small part of SAP work.

I agree.

[milanbenes]

looks lads, itä's Franko innit

nuff said


Milan.