• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Best Convertible

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by Another Dodgy Agent View Post
    Wifey must have been lucky, her Z4 has been bullet proof.
    Absolutely, do a search on the internet on US built BMW quality issues

    Originally posted by Another Dodgy Agent View Post
    Z4 runs the same platform engine as the M3 straight six and 265 bhp from a 3.0 litre engine is not "tame", unless your daily run around is a lambo, in which case I bow to your BHP!
    That's 88 bhp per litre, the s2000 has 120 bhp per litre

    a better comparison on engine size would be the 2.2 litre which a megre 80 bhp per litre.

    autocar testest the 2.2 0-60 as 7.7 secs, s takes 5.8

    Originally posted by Another Dodgy Agent View Post
    Residuals on the S2000 are not better than the Z4, Why?
    Less desirable I expect or because there are so many. The same year z4 is worth less than my honda

    Originally posted by Another Dodgy Agent View Post
    The S2000 was old tech when it came into distribution in 99 (Z4 hit production in 2003). since which the style, engine, electrics and so on have remained pretty much the same.
    You show your ignorance, the s2000 engine was new, it won engine of the year for 4 years beating BMW et al. The 2.2 z4 engine was straight out of the bmw 3 series, while good, hardly ground breaking. The s2000 engine is not out of any other honda.


    Originally posted by Another Dodgy Agent View Post
    Plus I would worry about revving a 4 pot up to 9000 revs - alright if you have access to an engine rebuild every 10000 miles but if not...lots of fast whirring machinery...
    There have been no Vtrec engine failures . The s2000 was JD power number 1 for customer satisfaction and reiability for 3 years on the run.


    Don't get me wrong the Z4 isn't bad, it's just not as good.
    Last edited by Bagpuss; 1 October 2008, 19:28.
    The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

    But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
      I am replacing a HondaS2000 but I want something different. I quite like the XK also
      Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
      The non 4 wheel drive only goes sideways from the front of the car as it understeers watch them drift on a roundabout. It's not a sports car it's a golf in a dress. New one is much better apparently but still had FWD!

      Sports cars are rear wheel drive.


      My 2 penneth


      The z4 is too tame, build quality isn't the best as it's built in the US and they can't build cars.

      The s2000 is wild when you wind it up or civilised if you don't. Servicing is cheap, less than a ford Ka, remarkable considering the complexity of the mechanics and the simplicity of the KA. Which shows you how much some other brands rip you off. Other plus points are

      - residuals on the s2000 are better than the z4.
      - road tax banding is below the high rate


      If not wanting too spend too much, the MR2 roadster is a bags of fun. Think of it as an Elise with build quality (lotus now use the MR2 engine). It also hits 30 faster than a Porsche Boxster.

      The MX5 is OK but not my cup of tea.



      PS I have a very nice s2000 for sale 26k miles immaculate.


      This is all a waste of typing though, like most women the main consideration will be the colour
      Another one that doesn't read requirements

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
        Another one that doesn't read requirements




        oops.

        The new Porsche Boxster it is then
        The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

        But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
          Someone who has a good grasp of "user requirements"

          BMW.. too many agents have them ADA' avatar
          Boxster .. cant afford a "proper" Porsche
          TVR .. fall to bits and probably too impractical (speed humps)
          Toyota/Mx5 too cheap
          Alfa.. maybe worth a look

          New AudiTT.. looking favourite with smaller engine.. Is it fun to drive though?
          XK with the less powerful engine any good? bit pricey
          Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post


          oops.

          The new Porsche Boxster it is then
          You're doing it on purpose now

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
            Another one that doesn't read requirements
            I blame the PM.
            Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

            Comment


              #46
              How can a Boxster be not affording a proper Porsche? Most commentators think the Cayman is as good as the basic 911 and the Boxster isn't that different to the Cayman.
              The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

              But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                I blame the PM.
                Touche

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                  How can a Boxster be not affording a proper Porsche? Most commentators think the Cayman is as good as the basic 911 and the Boxster isn't that different to the Cayman.
                  Somebody shoot me! I love the Cayman!

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
                    How can a Boxster be not affording a proper Porsche? Most commentators think the Cayman is as good as the basic 911 and the Boxster isn't that different to the Cayman.
                    Really? There you go DA, go with what most 'commentators' say. I think they are all armchair experts or aygo drivers myself.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Porsche made a mistake with the Cayman by making it too good, although it's not as pretty as the 911.
                      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X