• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

PA Consulting

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    For god’s sake, what is it you luddites are scared of about ID cards?

    .....
    The reason why I'm so for it is from November 2008, all foreign nationals will have to apply for "biometric residence permits" or "biometric visas" and their details will be entered into the national identity database. .....

    First step at putting British borders back in place.
    I see Incognito hasn't been back to answer any of the very valid questions asked or points raised - maybe he's Wilmslow's brother.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Incognito View Post
      By making ID cards compulsory then police can confirm who you are, Hospitals can confirm you are not a 'health' tourist, Employment agencies can confirm you have right to work, Benefit agencies can ascertain you're entitled to benefits, etc.
      Wrong way round. That is the marketing spiel. The reality is:

      By making ID cards compulsory then police will demand your ID whenever they feel like it, the NHS can save money by denying services to anyone not carrying one, some people wanting to work can be prevented from doing so, Benefit agencies can make it even harder to claim benefits so we can have people starving to death on the streets again like we did a hundred years ago, etc.

      None of that is worth the cost.
      My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
        Wrong way round. That is the marketing spiel. The reality is:

        By making ID cards compulsory then police will demand your ID whenever they feel like it, the NHS can save money by denying services to anyone not carrying one, some people wanting to work can be prevented from doing so, Benefit agencies can make it even harder to claim benefits so we can have people starving to death on the streets again like we did a hundred years ago, etc.

        None of that is worth the cost.
        Actually, it's based on false premise anyway - neither the government nor the pro-ID people can answer questions about how much we're going to have to spend to make it possible for the Health Service to verify who you are before treatment. Plainly there's no point relying on just the card as it will be so easy to forge, so they are going to need massive expenditure on systems (oh no) to read your fingerprints.

        As for benefits - government figures for fraud based on lies about who you are are way lower than the costs of ID cards so there's no net gain. Even the government accepts that the vast majority of benefit fraud is people lying about their circumstances but not about who they are.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
          WHS
          Internet Slang Dictionary WHS = "wanna have sex"

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Addanc View Post
            Internet Slang Dictionary WHS = "wanna have sex"
            Well, do ya
            How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

            Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
            Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

            "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
              Well, do ya
              There's sex, then there's walking with a limp and a wince for a week.
              My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                I see Incognito hasn't been back to answer any of the very valid questions asked or points raised - maybe he's Wilmslow's brother.
                I was working and then enjoying my bank holiday. I'll dredge this one back up again tomorrow seeing how you've brought it up again.
                "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                On them! On them! They fail!

                Comment


                  #38
                  Okay, just for Peoplesoft Bloke.

                  Please provide an example of a country with an ID card scheme that has also directly resulted in their 'borders being put back in place'.
                  Did I say it will magically cure our porous borders? What I said was "First step at putting British borders back in place." You even highlighted it. What it would then involve is a government with the balls to implement some tough policies. Something along the lines of:

                  Originally posted by RichardCranium View Post
                  Wrong way round. That is the marketing spiel. The reality is:

                  By making ID cards compulsory then police will demand your ID whenever they feel like it, the NHS can save money by denying services to anyone not carrying one, some people wanting to work can be prevented from doing so, Benefit agencies can make it even harder to claim benefits so we can have people starving to death on the streets again like we did a hundred years ago, etc.

                  None of that is worth the cost.
                  Someone’s worse nightmare, yet my idea of policies that would work although our aims are slightly different. The NHS will save money by refusing treatment to those NOT entitled to it. Benefit agencies can make it harder for those NOT entitled to it to claim.

                  Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
                  You haven't really thought about how all this will work in practice, just like the government.
                  No you're right, I haven't thought about this, I just make it all up on the spot.

                  http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006..._20060015_en_1

                  Have a read of it; the Credit Reference Agencies most probably hold more information about you.

                  Whilst Biometric ID cards can not be infallible, I believe it will require someone to physically steal the blank ID cards to forge any. At the moment, forged UK passports are mainly used for ID fraud at banks etc. Not many are used to enter the country as they are actually considered quite hard to fake and immigration officials know what they're looking for with these. With the NIR containing a biometric footprint, it doesn't matter if you can steal and fake a passport or ID card. You need to get your data onto that register. I'm not saying that won't happen, unfortunately we do have corrupt people in these places, but it will certainly reduce false applications and the majority of forgeries.
                  "I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith

                  On them! On them! They fail!

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
                    Okay, just for Peoplesoft Bloke.



                    Did I say it will magically cure our porous borders? What I said was "First step at putting British borders back in place." You even highlighted it. What it would then involve is a government with the balls to implement some tough policies. Something along the lines of:



                    Someone’s worse nightmare, yet my idea of policies that would work although our aims are slightly different. The NHS will save money by refusing treatment to those NOT entitled to it. Benefit agencies can make it harder for those NOT entitled to it to claim.



                    No you're right, I haven't thought about this, I just make it all up on the spot.

                    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006..._20060015_en_1

                    Have a read of it; the Credit Reference Agencies most probably hold more information about you.

                    Whilst Biometric ID cards can not be infallible, I believe it will require someone to physically steal the blank ID cards to forge any. At the moment, forged UK passports are mainly used for ID fraud at banks etc. Not many are used to enter the country as they are actually considered quite hard to fake and immigration officials know what they're looking for with these. With the NIR containing a biometric footprint, it doesn't matter if you can steal and fake a passport or ID card. You need to get your data onto that register. I'm not saying that won't happen, unfortunately we do have corrupt people in these places, but it will certainly reduce false applications and the majority of forgeries.

                    ID cards will not stop any of the things you talk about for the simple reason that they will be easy to obtain using false credentials. No-one needs to fake an ID card.

                    As I said before in this thread :

                    In order to get an ID card you need to prove who you are. Since all current forms of identity are fakeable without excessive effort or cost you simply fake the ID you need to get the ID card and bingo, you have a genuine, uncontestable, government approved ID that no-one can challenge.

                    Government so far have been remarkable reticent to actually answer questions about how one might go about getting an ID card and what documentation is required to do so. I suspect this is the reason.
                    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Incognito View Post
                      The NHS will save money by refusing treatment to those NOT entitled to it. Benefit agencies can make it harder for those NOT entitled to it to claim.
                      How much will be saved? How much will it cost to install the equipment needed to verify the id of every person before treatment? You don't have a clue, do you?

                      Originally posted by Incognito View Post
                      No you're right, I haven't thought about this, I just make it all up on the spot.

                      http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006..._20060015_en_1

                      Have a read of it; the Credit Reference Agencies most probably hold more information about you.
                      I have read it. Credit reference agencies do something useful and don't demand my fingerprints
                      Originally posted by Incognito View Post
                      Whilst Biometric ID cards can not be infallible, I believe it will require someone to physically steal the blank ID cards to forge any. At the moment, forged UK passports are mainly used for ID fraud at banks etc. Not many are used to enter the country as they are actually considered quite hard to fake and immigration officials know what they're looking for with these. With the NIR containing a biometric footprint, it doesn't matter if you can steal and fake a passport or ID card. You need to get your data onto that register. I'm not saying that won't happen, unfortunately we do have corrupt people in these places, but it will certainly reduce false applications and the majority of forgeries.
                      At what cost? This is a 'solution' looking for a problem and your regurgitating government propoganda doesn't make the case any better than they do.
                      Last edited by Peoplesoft bloke; 27 August 2008, 10:10. Reason: Typo

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X