Originally posted by DaveB
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
PA Consulting
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Indeed, and another reason ID cards (or at least the database) are a bad idea - as we have already seen, bent Coppers and bent DVLA officials can be bribed for data on you and where you live. It'll be that much worse when there's more data in one place. -
What I'm getting that is NOTHING should be treated as infallible.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostAhem - if they are supposed to be to "prove who you are" then they are pointless unless they are infallible.Comment
-
Yes, but it is possible to get password protected USB sticks and to encript data. At least there would be some nod towards security instead of the spate of unprotected data being carried around.Originally posted by DaveB View PostIn every case where data has been lost like this it has been people who have been at fault, not technology. Yes the data could have been encrypted, but that wont stop it being lost in the first place, it just mitigates the damage done if it is.
This a the fundamental principle of Data Security, Information Assurance, whatever you want to call it.
Technology is not the problem, people are the problem.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
I agree with you - and that fact alone makes ID cards pointless.Originally posted by Kess View PostWhat I'm getting that is NOTHING should be treated as infallible.Comment
-
Originally posted by Kess View Post... losing all that sensitive data - blimey.
I wonder why our thoughtful Government gave them all that geniune data to play with anyway?
And companies house has this details:
Name & Registered Office:
PA CONSULTING LIMITED
STONE COURT GREENHILL LANE
DENBURY
DEVON
TQ12 6DN
Company No. 06668700
Status: Active
Date of Incorporation: 08/08/2008
Comment
-
so does that mean that rather than being an actual consultancy, it's just a one man band jobbie like the rest of us?
Originally posted by schindler View PostAnd companies house has this details:
Name & Registered Office:
PA CONSULTING LIMITED
STONE COURT GREENHILL LANE
DENBURY
DEVON
TQ12 6DN
Company No. 06668700
Status: Active
Date of Incorporation: 08/08/2008
Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
Comment
-
and fairly a new one!!Originally posted by Bluebird View Postso does that mean that rather than being an actual consultancy, it's just a one man band jobbie like the rest of us?
Comment
-
Thats not them, you want PA Consulting Group. Not PA Consulting Ltd.Originally posted by schindler View PostAnd companies house has this details:
Name & Registered Office:
PA CONSULTING LIMITED
STONE COURT GREENHILL LANE
DENBURY
DEVON
TQ12 6DN
Company No. 06668700
Status: Active
Date of Incorporation: 08/08/2008

All their details are on their website"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Comment
-
Perhaps we could buy PA Consulting a copy of this recently published book.Where are we going? And what’s with this hand basket?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Today 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50

Comment