- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: PA Consulting
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "PA Consulting"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou’re an idiot, you don’t understand the technologies involved and you’re dredging up old papers from the internet. Most of the studies and experiences he refers to are nearly 10 years old and most probably using equipment manufactured 12-15 years ago (knowing how public sector purchasing schedules work).
Try reading this and try to comprehend the subject matter. It’s the latest Minex report, although it is from 2004 the current study has not yet been completed. It involved fingerprint images from a quarter of a million people, and executing in excess of 4.4 billion comparisons and the FNMR against FMR metrics for some of the products are exceptional considering the testing is against interoperability of disparate vendors and not single product metrics.
A 2004 study by the US NIJ on Iris recognition, from that the figures you are interested in are:
Of the more than 9,400 times someone attempted to enter the school using the iris scanners there were no known false positives or other misidentifications.
And again I’ll state that yes it’s statistically possible...
for someone to get a False-match result against a single Biometric reading, and yes it’s statistically possible that they achieve two False-match results returning two distinct identities against a double Biometric reading, but I will reiterate that it is almost statistically impossible for someone to achieve two False-match results returning a single identity against a double Biometric reading. Anyone who thinks differently better keep playing the lottery then because you've obviously got a great chance of winning it three weeks in a row.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou’re an idiot................
Originally posted by Incognito View PostI’m now saying no more on this subject as it’s dragging up the Google experts who think because they read something in the Guardian they’re an expert on the subject.
Originally posted by Incognito View PostFrom everyone that’s posted on here, there is only one other person who has even trialled the equipment. Obviously the rest of you just know better.
Just because we may be able to do something at a vast cost with no proven benefits at all in cost savings simply because the technology may exist, doesn't mean we should do it.
You have still offered no justification for ID cards other than some wild and unsubstansiated claims that you have got from government propoganda.
Leave a comment:
-
You’re trying to compare AFI methodology that is at best 10-15 years old that will scan against 8 to 16 Minutiae at best with today’s technology that can and will capture up to 52 separate points from a single fingerprint.
Try reading this and try to comprehend the subject matter. It’s the latest Minex report, although it is from 2004 the current study has not yet been completed. It involved fingerprint images from a quarter of a million people, and executing in excess of 4.4 billion comparisons and the FNMR against FMR metrics for some of the products are exceptional considering the testing is against interoperability of disparate vendors and not single product metrics.
A 2004 study by the US NIJ on Iris recognition, from that the figures you are interested in are:
Of the more than 9,400 times someone attempted to enter the school using the iris scanners there were no known false positives or other misidentifications.
I’m now saying no more on this subject as it’s dragging up the Google experts who think because they read something in the Guardian they’re an expert on the subject.
From everyone that’s posted on here, there is only one other person who has even trialled the equipment. Obviously the rest of you just know better.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Diver View PostGets my vote 100%
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostFor god’s sake, what is it you luddites are scared of about ID cards?
You can get more information off your driving licence.
The whole point about ID cards is that passports and licences are not compulsory. The card will simply be a way to prove who you are. Not everyone has a passport and not everyone has a driving licence.
By making ID cards compulsory then police can confirm who you are, Hospitals can confirm you are not a 'health' tourist, Employment agencies can confirm you have right to work, Benefit agencies can ascertain you're entitled to benefits, etc.
As for applying for an ID card, it'll be done in the same manner as applying for a first time passport and there is no new database, they've amended the proposals to utilise the databases of the other agencies, i.e. the passport service.
The reason why I'm so for it is from November 2008, all foreign nationals will have to apply for "biometric residence permits" or "biometric visas" and their details will be entered into the national identity database. The government also wants all foreign nationals living in the UK to have identity cards and will make anyone applying to extend their stay register biometric details, from November 2008. The aim is that 90% of foreign nationals in the UK will have ID cards by 2015.
First step at putting British borders back in place.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostI don't think you read or understood my post.
I said you cannot forge your Biometric data when you are not involved in the capture of it. They don't trust you to go into a little booth and get your photo taken.
My comment on it being almost statistically impossible was:
To explain, you may be Joe Bloggs and you may get a false positive against your fingerprint pattern identifying you as Bill Smith. It is then almost statistically impossible for you then to match your iris pattern as Bill Smith as well.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostSure you can. People leave their biometric passwords everywhere they go. They leave fingerprints (on the capturing device no less!) and their faces and irises can be photographed. All these biometrics must be captured under trained diligent supervision (including when used for mundane authenticiating and identification) otherwise they *will* be forged.
I'm not sure what to make of you saying it it is almost statistically impossible to have false positives (in a population of 60 million). Are you sure you're not trolling? You have come across the birthday theorem?
I said you cannot forge your Biometric data when you are not involved in the capture of it. They don't trust you to go into a little booth and get your photo taken.
My comment on it being almost statistically impossible was:
You may have a single false positive, but you would not have more than one. I believe it is almost statistically impossible.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou can't 'forge' your 'biometric' data when you are not involved in the capture of that data and that data could be iris scans, fingerprints, facial recognition scans, DNA profiling, etc. You may have a single false positive, but you would not have more than one. I believe it is almost statistically impossible.
I'm not sure what to make of you saying it it is almost statistically impossible to have false positives (in a population of 60 million). Are you sure you're not trolling? You have come across the birthday theorem?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostI have, you just don't agree with them. No point carrying this on.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/614027-post10.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostNot even what you trialled?
What part of Commercial in Confidence is tricky? It's perfectly normal and since I helped to write the NDA I am bound by it.
When and for that matter if the work is published that information will be available.
Security applies to commercial projects just as much as it does to Defence and Government ones.
Leave a comment:
-
I have, you just don't agree with them. No point carrying this on.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/614027-post10.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostYou're the only person on here that has come up with solid reasoning behind why you are unhappy with the idea.
Originally posted by Incognito View Postbefore all the luddites seize on it
The ID card scheme does not offer me any benefits at all. You can do no more than make vague assertions which you are good enough to admit have not been subject to any cost benefit analysis. You cannot point to any concrete benefits that justify the huge expense and inconvenience to the majority of law abiding citizens.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: