• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

£800 to park me car outside the house...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
    It's the principle.

    PS: got them to 1200.
    "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
      Fella a couple of doors down the road from me has got a 1961 Rover 100 in immaculate condition. 3 litre engine so a bit thirsty. Beautiful car though.

      Old lady opposite has a Ford Zephyr. That's not in such good condition, quite rusty bodywork, but she goes and does her shopping in it every week.

      There's a Hillman Hunter parked at the bottom of the road quite often as well. Not sure whose it is though.
      <cough> 2.6 litre...

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
        <cough> 2.6 litre...
        Apologies, you are right. It had the short stroke version of the P5's 3 litre engine.

        I'm Spartacus.

        Comment


          #34
          <cough> the 3 litre engine was an evolution of the 2.6... apparently Rover were unhappy with the concept of siamesed bores at the time, so the 3 litre engine was longer to accomodate the larger bore necessary to reach 3 litres...

          I count rivets too.

          Neither engine could be described as short stroke, since both were designed with the RAC hp rating in mind...

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
            <cough> the 3 litre engine was an evolution of the 2.6... apparently Rover were unhappy with the concept of siamesed bores at the time, so the 3 litre engine was longer to accomodate the larger bore necessary to reach 3 litres...

            I count rivets too.

            Neither engine could be described as short stroke, since both were designed with the RAC hp rating in mind...
            Yeah, WHS.
            I'm Spartacus.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
              It's the principle.

              PS: got them to 1200.
              Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
                Car hire is starting to appeal... hassle factor I suppose, grew up in the age of convenience I like being able to walk out the house straight to the car.
                But for that sort of money, you're into Porsche/SLK rental. I got a new Boxster for the weekend inc unlimited mileage for about £600. They even delivered it to my door.
                And the lord said unto John; "come forth and receive eternal life." But John came fifth and won a toaster.

                Comment

                Working...
                X