Originally posted by NickFitz
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
 - Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
 
Oil prices resumed climbing yesterday as ...
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
					Collapse
				
				
				
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
					
						
							
						
					
				
				
				
				
					
				
			- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
They did have a seige at their embassy in 1980. However, that was more of a domestic argument rather than against us.How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Then they should have resolved it by drawing straws or something!Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostHowever, that was more of a domestic argument rather than against us.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Yes, that seems like a valid point. The Japanese may have have enjoyed greater freedoms sooner as a consequence of being nuked (or being fire-bombed big-time) by the yanks, not least because it avoided a Soviet occupation. Moral dilemma time.Originally posted by zeitghostHaving built it, the Septics were going to use it... apart from anything else, it was a demonstration for Stalin... remember that the USSR only declared war on Japan on August 9th or 10th 1945...
The Yanks were determined that there was not going to be a situation in Japan that resembled the partition of Germany.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
iran have said they intend to wipe israel of the face of teh earth, now as someone already tried to do this to them, i think its fair enough that they should take the threat seriously and get in firstOriginally posted by Pickle2 View PostIm no great fan of Iran, but i wouldnt mind seeing Israel get a bit of a shoe-ing to be honest.
If Israel attack, I dont think anyone could really dispute the Iranians right to return fire surely? I still think its a big IF though, I cant see them trying it anytime soon, despite all the recent hoo-har.
israel from what i have seen does not go around the world looking for trouble, there are only a few million of them on a small piece of land, why cant they be left alone. the arab world is a pretty big place why dont all the palestinians go and live with their arab brothers and we can all have some peace
the jews have actually contributed and still contribute to society in meaningful ways, i struggle to say the same about the arab/muslim worldComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Not only that but a dozen times as many Japanese would have been killed, along with hundreds of thousands of allied troops, in an invasion of the Japanese mainland. General MacArthur reckoned over a million would have died.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostYes, that seems like a valid point. The Japanese may have have enjoyed greater freedoms sooner as a consequence of being nuked (or being fire-bombed big-time) by the yanks, not least because it avoided a Soviet occupation. Moral dilemma time.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Something you have to remember here. In a total war, and they are very few and far between, the entire economy is used as a weapon. Anything that supports the economy is a combatant and there are very few innocents around. Everyone becomes a target, so lets just hope the next one happens after we are long goneOriginally posted by blacjac View PostOh well that's OK then. After all it was only thousands of innocent civilians that died.
							
						(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Yeah I suppose we should get rid of Algebra, Arabic numerals, Medicine, Astronomy and leave it to the Arabs.Originally posted by mrdonuts View Postiran have said they intend to wipe israel of the face of teh earth, now as someone already tried to do this to them, i think its fair enough that they should take the threat seriously and get in first
israel from what i have seen does not go around the world looking for trouble, there are only a few million of them on a small piece of land, why cant they be left alone. the arab world is a pretty big place why dont all the palestinians go and live with their arab brothers and we can all have some peace
the jews have actually contributed and still contribute to society in meaningful ways, i struggle to say the same about the arab/muslim world
Peace? Do the Israeli's want peace? That could mean the end of the billions of military aid and billions of financial aid.McCoy: "Medical men are trained in logic."
Spock: "Trained? Judging from you, I would have guessed it was trial and error."Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
All of that was a few hundred years ago when the Muslim world was generally tolerant and forward thinking. See the connection?Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostYeah I suppose we should get rid of Algebra, Arabic numerals, Medicine, Astronomy and leave it to the Arabs.
.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View PostYeah I suppose we should get rid of Algebra, Arabic numerals, Medicine, Astronomy and leave it to the Arabs.
Peace? Do the Israeli's want peace? That could mean the end of the billions of military aid and billions of financial aid.






 Well said! Totally agree.
							
						Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
I would not put it past Israel to conduct swift & strategic conventional strikes against Iranian weapons development facilities in the near/mid future. And I wouldn't blame them at all for doing so - good luck to them if they do. Let's just hope that the Russians/Chinese don't take action against them. That really would be a slippery slope.Originally posted by Diver View PostWith the history of aggression against Israel by the Arab Nations, I would not blame them in the slightest for taking out the reactors in Iran.
No they didn't - they said they wanted to wipe 'Zionism' [sic, literal translation] off the face of the Earth - that carries a very different connotation.Originally posted by mrdonuts View Postiran have said they intend to wipe israel of the face of teh earthComment
 
- Home
 - News & Features
 - First Timers
 - IR35 / S660 / BN66
 - Employee Benefit Trusts
 - Agency Workers Regulations
 - MSC Legislation
 - Limited Companies
 - Dividends
 - Umbrella Company
 - VAT / Flat Rate VAT
 - Job News & Guides
 - Money News & Guides
 - Guide to Contracts
 - Successful Contracting
 - Contracting Overseas
 - Contractor Calculators
 - MVL
 - Contractor Expenses
 
Advertisers

				
				
				
				
Comment