I once did 90 in a Metro on a hot day and melted the points!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Fastest you have ever driven on a UK public road
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Then if there weren't 3 deaths at that spot next year, it would prove that the speed camera worked.....Originally posted by daviejones View PostI would like to see how they classify a "road death". There was a clip on Top Gear where they were trying to justify why a speed camera had been placed in a particular spot. Apparently there had been 3 deaths (or accidents) at that spot. If I recall, one was someone walking into the road, one was a crash and one was someone jumping off a bridge!! I just find it hard to justify a speed camera in those circumstances...Comment
-
Not quite sure how a speed camera stops someone jumping off a bridge...but am happy to be convinced if you can give it a go...Originally posted by expat View PostThen if there weren't 3 deaths at that spot next year, it would prove that the speed camera worked.....
"If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"Comment
-
Crazy Lizard Logic...but I like the approach.Originally posted by zeitghostEasy.
They land on the speed camera & it breaks their fall.
And the speed camera too hopefully.
"If you can read this, thank a teacher....and since it's in English, thank a soldier"Comment
-
Originally posted by shoes View PostThe last copper to pull me over (unmarked car) timed my average speed at 95 and told me 'there is nothing wrong with your driving, but you can't go that fast'. I got 3 points and a fine.
The last time I was stopped on a speed related matter it was by two cop bikers on the M62 from Leeds. Their first words to me were "well we know it'll do over a ton then". I thought I was shafted. Turned out they only wanted to have a gander at my car, which was one of the first Lotus Exiges a week after I got it. After asking me all sorts of questions about it they said seeing as I wasn't being a danger to other traffic they'd let me off.
So if the fuzz can tell when sometimes excessive speed isn't a danger, the speed limits on motorways should be for guidance, and the conditions at the time of the potential offence should have more bearing than outright speed.
For example, I sometimes feel nervous flying past much slower traffic hogging the first two lanes (such as when you've got two lorries overtaking each other) even though I may only be doing around 70, as it only takes one muppet to pull out without looking and it's game over. In those situations even 70 is too fast.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
If a copper catches someone stealing your stereo, is that also "a tax" on theft?Originally posted by shoes View PostHabitually take my car to 100 (indicated on the speedo) when on A roads or motorway as part of my daily commute. Only do it on the way in when its light and when traffic and conditions permit, which is most days. I choose 100 because it's where the ban kicks in. It's no big deal, the car is comfortable at that speed and the roads on my route are suitable. I do it to get to work sooner so I can leave sooner. A copper stopping me from doing that is just collecting tax. They can have it if they catch me - face, bovered.
They are both criminal offences.Comment
-
That's the kind of logic the scammera people use. This brings us into the realm of false positives or false negatives. What if one year (after speed cameras) accidents fell but the next year they rose?Originally posted by expat View PostThen if there weren't 3 deaths at that spot next year, it would prove that the speed camera worked.....
We could claim both, speed cameras had a positive effect year on year, and also claim they had a negative effect year on year.
The more likely truth is the weather was bad for one of the years, and therefore the years are not directly comparable. Yet environmental conditions are never factored into these schoolboy safety 'facts'. The effect of safety cameras has never been objectively and validly studied further than excel type summary stats, and then only the results that back up their argument are revealed i.e. shockingly biased propagandaThe court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
145 mph in a Vectra GSi on the M3 early one morning trying to get to the Channel Tunnel (not realising we could just get the next train :-)
Caught doing 101 on a dual carriageway driving home from Norwich, got 5 points and a big fine, stopped going fast after that.............Comment
-
I need a faster car seeing as how many have managed to go over 140mph, I've hit an indicated 136mph in mine on a runway, car has 150bhp its an A3
Comment
-
You poor bastard.Originally posted by Bumfluff View PostI need a faster car seeing as how many have managed to go over 140mph, I've hit an indicated 136mph in mine on a runway, car has 150bhp its an A3
Ah well, at least you've got tits like Liz Hurley.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment