http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/o...re/7095635.stm
The judge has given an assurance that, on the return of the children, the court will deal with any dispute "from first principles, without assuming one parent has a greater right over the other and at all times pursuant to the welfare interests of the children".
================================================
There can't be many men who have been through the family courts who believe that they will actually apply the 1989 Children Act. Too many precedents have been set that the best interests of the children is that the mother gets her own way.
Take the case of Peter Maynard whose ex-wife found that him seeing the children caused her distress so it was not in the interests of the child so he was stopped from seeing them.
Hope the chap stays in Pakistan until the British Legal system is as good as theirs.
The judge has given an assurance that, on the return of the children, the court will deal with any dispute "from first principles, without assuming one parent has a greater right over the other and at all times pursuant to the welfare interests of the children".
================================================
There can't be many men who have been through the family courts who believe that they will actually apply the 1989 Children Act. Too many precedents have been set that the best interests of the children is that the mother gets her own way.
Take the case of Peter Maynard whose ex-wife found that him seeing the children caused her distress so it was not in the interests of the child so he was stopped from seeing them.
Hope the chap stays in Pakistan until the British Legal system is as good as theirs.
Comment