• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Car finance - the next PPI scandal...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Car finance - the next PPI scandal...

    The car finance market is in chaos after a shock court ruling left banks and lenders scrambling to save it from collapse.

    Lloyds Banking Group has now scrapped their commission payments to dealers, after a Court of Appeal judgement ruled car salesmen must inform their customers about bonuses, commissions and fees they get from lenders.
    It comes after three complainants won their Court of Appeal battle, saying they were mis-sold motor finance. They ruled that 'a broker could not lawfully receive a commission from a lender without obtaining the customer's fully informed consent to the payment', CityAM reports.
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...mmissions.html

    PPI was about policies sold to them they couldn't claim on so paying for nothing so a fairly clear case of getting your money back. This one appears to be about commissions being hidden but not sure if that means there is a basis for a claim by the customer. Can they claim the amount of commission back from someone as it wasn't legally applied?

    Is this another biggie that's gonna run for years?
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    #2
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post


    Is this another biggie that's gonna run for years?
    Yes

    Edit to add - basically all interest charge will need to be repaid...
    merely at clientco for the entertainment

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      This one appears to be about commissions being hidden but not sure if that means there is a basis for a claim by the customer. Can they claim the amount of commission back from someone as it wasn't legally applied?
      It appears so:
      https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/re...m-car-finance/
      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        I can hear all the PPI claim firms pulling the dust covers off the desks and firing up the autodiallers already.
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

          I can hear all the PPI claim firms pulling the dust covers off the desks and firing up the autodiallers already.
          My Twitter feed is already thoroughly polluted by such.
          Chief Executive, FCSA
          - Former CEO OF IPSE
          - LtdCo Contractor for 20 odd years before that
          - Former Chair of IPSE nee PCG

          Comment


            #6
            Absolute bollocks decision by the court. Would be baffling if the SC doesnt overturn it. Who knew salesmen and women, in any form of selling, got commission?

            It's like this diesel nonesense of people suing because their car gave a lower emission reading 'on test' so they ended paying less VED in the UK than if the car had given a higher co2 reading 'off' test.

            [Rhetorical question]Are any of these owners paying the additional VED they should have?[/Rhetorical question] N, but they think they're 'entitled' to compo all the same!
            I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by BolshieBastard View Post
              Absolute bollocks decision by the court. Would be baffling if the SC doesnt overturn it. Who knew salesmen and women, in any form of selling, got commission?

              It's like this diesel nonesense of people suing because their car gave a lower emission reading 'on test' so they ended paying less VED in the UK than if the car had given a higher co2 reading 'off' test.

              [Rhetorical question]Are any of these owners paying the additional VED they should have?[/Rhetorical question] N, but they think they're 'entitled' to compo all the same!
              It's just a variation of Wood v Commercial First Business Ltd and Othersfrom 2021...
              merely at clientco for the entertainment

              Comment

              Working...
              X