ULEZ Expansion is lawful

[SchumiStars]

It was always going to go-ahead. The tulip show was just to get people to buy into it. The worrying thing is that I believe all of these charges will come into play, ULEZ, Congestion Charging and the final addition will be road charging.

[SueEllen]

It was always going to go-ahead. The tulip show was just to get people to buy into it. The worrying thing is that I believe all of these charges will come into play, ULEZ, Congestion Charging and the final addition will be road charging.

Road charging is coming otherwise they have to think of another way to tax everyone.

[TwoWolves]

I lived in London for over 30 years. Most of the air pollution is due to lorries bringing in building materials or food/clothing. Charging ordinary workers is not going to solve anything and the worst air quality is down in the tube.

If you think this is going to fix anything you are retarded.

[Snooky]

I lived in London for over 30 years. Most of the air pollution is due to lorries bringing in building materials or food/clothing. Charging ordinary workers is not going to solve anything and the worst air quality is down in the tube.

If you think this is going to fix anything you are retarded.

Were you studying air pollution sources during those 30 years or is this purely anecdotal? Someone should tell the air quality experts.

[JustKeepSwimming]

I thought brake dust was the biggest polluter in inner cities?

[Paddy]

I thought brake dust was the biggest polluter in inner cities?

That is correct with EVs being the worst polluter due to their heavy weight.

[Snooky]

That is correct with EVs being the worst polluter due to their heavy weight.

Citation please?

[malvolio]

Citation please?

How about Kings College and the RAC? Which together prove the answer is "It's not proven either way"...

the origin of the comment itself was the Minister for Transport. Being a politician, he is probably uniquely not qualified to make such statements!