Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Too many exciteable people on this thread dreaming up scenarios after the fact. IMHO it happened pretty much as the official line states. Ironically, many of the yank-bashers on here are uncharacteristically going to great pains to avoid levelling much-deserved charges of incompetence to a whole battery of bodies that were involved here from the FBI and the Oval Office downwards. The only possible cover-up for me revolves around Flight 93, and whether or not the passengers caused the crash or an F-16. However, considering what the powers that be might have been aware of at that time, it would have been an understandable reaction.
Ironically, many of the yank-bashers on here are uncharacteristically going to great pains to avoid levelling much-deserved charges of incompetence to a whole battery of bodies that were involved here from the FBI and the Oval Office downwards.
I mentioned it in my first post
The only conspiracy that went on was the subsequent cover up of intelligence organisations failing to act or pass on vital information.
but the argument quickly descended into the physics of the disaster, or the pseudo physics at least given some peoples understanding of the subject
Crack out the bubbly sg. This first tiny step marks a watershed in your intellectual development. Keep this up and you'll be upside alexei trying out as a traffic bollard before the year is out!
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”
In fact that's the problem with conspiracy theories in general. Creating and covering up a major action/non-action pre-supposes a level of competence that any groups/bodies/organisations, let alone governments, do not possess.
In fact that's the problem with conspiracy theories in general. Creating and covering up a major action/non-action pre-supposes a level of competence that any groups/bodies/organisations, let alone governments, do not possess.
Theres plenty of unanswered questions and theres plenty of suspect evidence so in effect they have made cock up after cock but they rely on people like you to do nothing and just go back to your safe little house thinking the world is flat. It cant be true can it?
Theres plenty of unanswered questions and theres plenty of suspect evidence so in effect they have made cock up after cock but they rely on people like you to do nothing and just go back to your safe little house thinking the world is flat. It cant be true can it?
They are not so much unanswered as simply misunderstood by paranoid numpties like you mate. I bet you are in the ALF too, aren't you? Can we call you "Swampy"?
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”
They are not so much unanswered as simply misunderstood by paranoid numpties like you mate. I bet you are in the ALF too, aren't you? Can we call you "Swampy"?
Theres plenty of unanswered questions and theres plenty of suspect evidence so in effect they have made cock up after cock but they rely on people like you to do nothing and just go back to your safe little house thinking the world is flat. It cant be true can it?
I am generally sceptical about what is reported by the media and I like to scrutinise before I accept something as truth in my mind, just because on this occasion I'm not jumping round like a loony it doesn’t make me apathetic.
People are angry that it happened and want to know why it wasn't stopped, the only conspiracy is the cover up which was exposing the lack of intelligence the US spooks had.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
They are not so much unanswered as simply misunderstood by paranoid numpties like you mate. I bet you are in the ALF too, aren't you? Can we call you "Swampy"?
Comment