Originally posted by shaunbhoy
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
9/11 Conspiracy
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
My God, you are a solid-gold, 24ct feckin' idiot aren't you?
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
-
Comment
-
Maybe, but at least when I compute ....Large passenger jets full of aviation fuel being flown by dissidents going full tilt into buildings resulting in said buildings burning then collapsing due to the laws of physics, I don't produce the solution that it must be due to cynical connivance at the pinnacle of government coupled with a mystery explosives expert at large in WTC 1,2, and 3. A plot so convoluted that it could not possibly have remained uncovered for so long given the intense media scrutiny the events have received.Originally posted by bogeymanMy God, you are a solid-gold, 24ct feckin' idiot aren't you?
Now THAT would be the deduction of an idiot. Better figure out where you sit bogey, because you are coming across as someone that has fallen down the dimwit stairs cracking your bonce on every one. No change there mind you.
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Well the 'laws of physics', structural dynamics and engineering, seem to suggest otherwise and I restate, for the record, that you are an idot of the first water [no dancing bananas necessary for effect]Originally posted by shaunbhoyMaybe, but at least when I compute ....Large passenger jets full of aviation fuel being flown by dissidents going full tilt into buildings resulting in said buildings burning then collapsing due to the laws of physics, I don't produce the solution that it must be due to cynical connivance at the pinnacle of government coupled with a mystery explosives expert at large in WTC 1,2, and 3. A plot so convoluted that it could not possibly have remained uncovered for so long given the intense media scrutiny the events have received.
Now THAT would be the deduction of an idiot. Better figure out where you sit bogey, because you are coming across as someone that has fallen down the dimwit stairs cracking your bonce on every one. No change there mind you.
Last edited by bogeyman; 22 February 2007, 16:21.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
I wish there was a 'handbags' emoticon.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
And you expected the buildings to do exactly what then numbskull? A forward roll or a dying swan maybe? You really have cornered the market at burying your head in the sand bogey. An "idot" indeed, for the record.Originally posted by bogeymanWell the 'laws of physics', structural dynamics and engineering, seem to suggest otherwise
Got any other juicy paranoia to share with us? Let me guess, Dr Kelly was murdered by the Tooth Fairy, or Shergar is alive and well and working in a Tapas Bar in Alicante.
Wake up and smell what you are shovelling you cretin!“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
no they don't, I'm with shaunboy on thisOriginally posted by bogeymanWell the 'laws of physics', structural dynamics and engineering, seem to suggest otherwiseCoffee's for closersComment
-
your sig would be much funnier if you dropped the THE before USOriginally posted by gingerjediI wish there was a 'handbags' emoticon.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Oh you're spanking me with an emoticon now.Originally posted by shaunbhoyWake up and smell what you are shovelling you cretin!
Oww! Oww!
You prat
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
It's by far the most plausible explanation.Originally posted by bogeymanI suppose we should just accept the official line then?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58


Comment